Unquestioning Christian Nationalism: Preaching Nehemiah

Do not be unequally yoked with unbelievers. For what partnership has righteousness with lawlessness? Or what fellowship has light with darkness? What accord has Christ with Belial? Or what portion does a believer share with an unbeliever? What agreement has the temple of God with idols? For we are the temple of the living God; as God said, “I will make my dwelling among them and walk among them, and I will be their God, and they shall be my people. Therefore go out from their midst, and be separate from them, says the Lord, and touch no unclean thing; then I will welcome you, and I will be a father to you, and you shall be sons and daughters to me, says the Lord Almighty.” 2 Corinthians 6: 14-18

Nehemiah is commonly preached as an example of godly leadership; he was a fellow who decisively acted and used state power to make things happen for the people of God. The story fits in well with the current Christian culture which seeks to use political power to accomplish godly purposes which are largely discerned through the strength of feelings. If you see yourself as among God’s chosen, and have strong feelings about how God is speaking to you (and yours,) what’s not to like? Those outside of that certainty, perhaps not so much. This polemic will exclude most of the questions concerning entanglements with Zoroastrianism, timeline discrepancies, archeological evidence regarding the state of the wall and the success of the rebuilding/repopulation projects, and the many complex questions concerning how the books of Ezra and Nehemiah fit together to simply take it as it is commonly taught in evangelical environments focusing on how the common (understanding of the) narrative supports the Christian Nationalist program which is comprised of people who think very highly of their God-given position to sift, exclude, and rule the rest of us for our own (supposed) good. I’ll begin by summarizing the story of Nehemiah to then shift to make an argument about how the current use and understanding of that story conflicts with other teachings throughout the Bible before moving towards how the story is inverted to fit current Christian political and social goals. As the overall number of evangelicals continue to diminish, the anxiety and perception of threat to the average evangelical grows. To maintain a sense of safety and strength, those evangelical groups who remain faithful have been for decades concentrating their influence to maintain comfort and the sense of supremacy. The writing is on the wall as white Christian demographic supremacy fades so they preach that representative and inclusive democracy must go. The evangelical’s take on the story of Nehemiah helps to provide godly sanction to the mission of silencing ‘the others’ to continue the Great Work.

Perhaps a better understanding of Nehemiah’s story is that Nehemiah himself is the antithesis of a righteous leader, but that is not how the story is commonly taught. A brief synopsis of the story goes that Nehemiah was a cupbearer to Artaxerxes I (465-424 BC,) the supreme political power in that area at that time. (Nehemiah was anyone but an ‘ordinary guy.’) Worship at the Temple in Jerusalem had been reestablished with the laying of the foundations of the ‘second temple’ in 536 BC under the commission of Cyrus the Great. Although temple worship was occurring in Jerusalem, Nehemiah was distraught upon hearing about the ‘shame’ of Jerusalem’s walls and gates remaining in ruins after 140 or so years. (The Samaritans had prevented the wall from being rebuilt.) Nehemiah prayed to the ‘god of heaven’ (there is no record that God answered this prayer) and then took it upon himself to solicit a commission from Artaxerxes to return to Jerusalem to rebuild its walls and gates. Nehemiah went to Jerusalem to organize a rebuilding project which was met with local opposition who were perhaps rightly concerned that the Jews might be organizing a revolt against the king (Neh 2: 19, Ezra 4:13.) Nehemiah refused to address these concerns to rather to take up arms to defend the project. After the walls were rebuilt, Nehemiah institutes economic reforms ending collecting interest from Jews. (This could make him popular.)

In all this, we are to take Nehemiah’s word that Tobiah and Sanballat are malevolent actors not worthy of assurance that the Jews are fixing to rebel. Granted, they are important actors defending their own interests, but evil? It seems reasonable to assume local leaders would be significantly incentivized to quell any potential for rebellion and tax evasion as they were all living under the boot of an empire. The admission that Nehemiah does not want to talk to these people who reside outside ‘the assembly of the Lord’ is very telling. Nehemiah blithely dismisses the concern (Neh 6:8) although his actions say otherwise. No matter, the ‘others’ are to be brushed off as ‘distractions,’ ‘haters,’ and ‘enemies’ because ‘God has spoken,’ as Matt put it his March 19th, 2023 sermon at CentNaz. (That’s just plain dishonest, Matt. Nowhere in the text does God speak; but I’m getting ahead of myself.) Now that Nehemiah’s power has been solidified, religious reforms follow as Ezra the Scribe read the Law which was ‘in his hand,’ (Ezra 7: 14) that is, in his power, to the people to separate themselves from ‘the others.’ (Scholarship tends to place the assembly of today’s Torah in the hands of Ezra.) The land was claimed as their own (Neh 9:6) and the tithing system was reestablished (Neh 10.) The ‘in’ (golah) group was named and (re)established accordingly in Nehemiah 11 & 12. All of this led to the violent separation of the holy from the unholy in chapter 13. (But Matt is not going to talk about this.)

Nehemiah 13 is very specific in its ethnic prejudice. No Ammonite (sorry Zelek) or Moabite (sorry Ruth) shall enter the assembly of God (Deut 23:3, Neh 13: 1.) All those of foreign descent were separated from the assembly (Neh 13:3.) Support for the church was firmly accounted for and teeth was given to the laws enforcing the Sabbath. Then the whole affair ended up with violence as Nehemiah admits to assaulting people (Neh 13: 25) for the apparent crime of being of the ‘wrong’ lineage.  Apparently, to be holy, the unholy wives and children had to be ‘put away,’ divorced and disowned (Ezra 10) to maintain the purity of the holy people. (Welcome to Utopia.)

Lots of apologetics minded folks have tried to sugar-coat this to say that this purge was not ethnic in nature. I think the gymnastics involved to accomplish this are insurmountable. (As a former evangelical apologetics ‘expert,’ now that I’m outside of that culture, I think the general arguments to explain this away to the modern, liberal mind are convoluted and weak.) Nehemiah has been often cited as a defense for forbidding interracial marriage. (R.J. Rushdoony, reconstructionist and godfather of the Christian homeschool movement was explicit about this. Gary North and Doug Wilson are Rushdoony-lite descendants who have softened this kind of rhetoric for more modern ears.) The story of Nehemiah, if we are to suppose (as good evangelicals are instructed to do) his actions to have been indeed sanctioned by God, serves to uphold the unification of the powers of church and state, and to uphold the righteousness of separating ‘us’ from ‘them.’ It upholds and justifies the use of violence to accomplish this separation. The culture of separation Nehemiah and Ezra established led to the divisions and hatred between the Jews, Samaritans, and the Gentiles. The culture of separation continues today.

Jesus, Paul, and the later Christians who complied the New Testament, which included often unfairly maligning the Jewish leadership (strongly contributing to a long history of antisemitism and violence of Christian people against Jewish people,) most often sought to end Jewish ethnic and racial supremacy as it relates to who are the ‘chosen’ people of God. The New Testament thus supposedly supplants the Old, in an odd way, one people group for another even though some passages in the Bible say that all human beings are the inheritors of God’s greatest gift to us. Now that the white, Protestant Europeans who landed at Plymouth to eventually establish the greatest nation on this green earth (so we are told,) have assumed the position as God’s chosen, Nehemiah’s story has been appropriated to support the Christian Nationalist narrative and mission to save the world from the powers of the godless heathens. (As the enigmatic, inscrutable, complex love-hate relationship between Jews and Christians continues to confuse the hell out of me…)

The faithful may argue that this concept of separation was just an Old Testament thing. Think again. This is why I prefaced with the passage from 2 Corinthian 6: 14-18. The language is binary and explicit—light from dark, righteous from evil. This passage has been used literally to support the separation between religions but also based upon skin color. Our Puritan roots, the very success of the Protestant work ethic, and the assumption that the descendants of these ideals are now tasked with saving the rest of the world as they are ‘the city on the hill,’ fits very nicely into the belief behind the unification of church and state because if you take the Paul’s binary language to heart those who are not specifically Christian are literally evil. Do we take this literally? Or as hyperbole from which we make practical adjustments?

(Concerning being literally evil as an ‘other’: As Matt said, either on the 12th or 19th [forgot which,] something to the effect that, ‘just the name Geshem just sounds like he’s a really bad dude.’ Such an explicitly flippant, stupid, off-hand, unsubstantiated ‘observation’ from a religious authority in a sermon shows me the prejudice is just baked into a plethora of matters Christian don’t bother to give a second thought about how they hurt people by not caring about other people’s perceptions and experiences. Did Matt make this idiotic statement because Geshem was described as the Arab? I don’t know. Was it prejudicial? Definitely.)

Thus, it would seem if Paul’s directive were to be taken literally, those who do not profess to be Christian are not fit for leadership over Christians simply because they are evil. (But then there’s Romans 13. Ugh. Confused? Me too.) It seems then, that if God’s people are to remain holy, they either must remove themselves from the world, as people like the Amish have attempted to do. Or they must wield the political power to make the appropriate prohibitions and separations happen. The founding fathers did their best to create a secular government but white Christians have not had to worry about much since they’ve been demographically dominant for the past several hundred years. They’ve enjoyed the upper hand socially and politically and have thus so far been able to impose their will through democratic processes. Now that white Christians are in decline numerically, adjustments need to be made to keep the proper prohibitions and separations in place. Forward looking people who pioneered the Christian Right have been working this ‘problem’ for decades.

The Christian political establishment is more than happy to ally itself with people and organizations who do not necessarily share the same evangelical faith but share the same goal of moving the country towards a ‘Christian‘ autocracy. The ambitious know how to play the game with this very well-organized voting bloc. Paul’s directive to separate is now softened to the point where it is politically expedient. The evangelical largely sees the separation of light from dark as akin to the separation between Right from Left. This binary model encourages infiltration by power-hungry people who will claim the appropriate faith to be accepted, and thus gain power, to accomplish their own personal goals by offering the faithful what they want to hear politically. Being recognized as faithful it not so much following the peaceful, inclusive, and humble teachings of Christ as it is the mere public profession of faith and adherence to the Right’s political agenda. This is in good part why our leadership is populated with a mass of vitriolic miscreants, who better than 90% profess to be Christian, who rail on about the demonic ‘wokeness’ (an appropriated word which now is a catch all for anything the Right doesn’t like,) they, when pressed, cannot even define. We could thank Billy Graham and the Christian Right movement for this development of Christians fighting against communism and for the American way.

But how dare I criticize Billy? Reinhold Niebuhr criticized Graham’s popular program of public profession, which birthed things like ‘the sinner’s prayer,’ for its ‘pietistic individualism.’ (Although Niebuhr had kind things to say about Graham himself.) The historical collective action of evangelical Christians towards social causes, for both good and ill, eventually gave way to a very individualistic faith which suited and adjusted itself to the cares and desires of the individual. The doctrine of capitalism got merged in and the ‘social gospel’ faded to be associated with the evils of socialism and the communist threat. The shades of gray of collective human rational debate gave way to a black and white ethic guided by individual feelings backed by the authority of God. It’s absurd, but that’s what it’s come to be.

After several hundred years under this ‘Bible-backed’ supremacist assumption (God talks to me and not thee,) your own preacher does not have to be explicitly offensive to get the point across. All the cultural appropriations and assumptions are baked in thanks to a massive Christian media empire. (I’ve cited all kinds of statistics in this blog to support this assertion.) Evangelical Christians now believe in the use of political power to accomplish ‘God’s Ends,’ as they are continually filled with fear concerning the threat of ‘the others.’ Violence to achieve the ‘ends’ is no big deal. (Continued, and growing, sympathy for the ‘patriots’ of J6 shows this. Thanks to complicity and Tucker.) Helping this ‘end,’ FoxNews pastors a huge flock who’ve been trained by the evangelical system to receive the message; those at Fox are proven, through tangible evidence obtained from uncovered internal communications, bald-faced liars, frauds, frequently vicious, but they know their audience. FoxNews knows what their audience wants to hear, the actual truth does not matter, the mission is too important, and the illusion of supremacy must be maintained. To the evangelical, the ‘truth’ of God’s will is both personally felt and collectively revealed. The modern evangelical may be more forgiving than Nehemiah was, but there is still a very clear ‘us’ and ‘them.’ Pulling the curtain back reveals some very ugly stuff.

Summarizing much of what I’ve previous written about concerning the advancement of the Christian Nationalist agenda, the Christian media machine is immense informing the masses about how to interact with God. Money changes hands, power arrangements are negotiated, the bounds of who is ‘in’ and who is ‘out’ are set. All this cultural influence programs our minds to adhere to an amazingly self-regulatory system balancing charisma with self-interest to keep ‘everyone’ (that is, God’s chosen) happy and the money flowing. The effect of all this cultural assumption and practice upon our understanding of how we now come to hear God is profound. The collective Christian culture, with all it many voices and desires has literally become the voice of God. How the book of Nehemiah has been preached for the past several hundred years has helped immensely with this process. I’ll explain.  

It is curious to note that the typical pattern of ‘revelation’ in the Bible has God specifically speaking to someone to do something specific. Noah, make a boat (Gen 6: 14.) Abram go to Canaan (Gen 12.) Isaac don’t go to Egypt (Gen 26: 12.) Jacob, go home (Gen 31: 3.) Moses, tell Pharaoh to let my people go (Ex 3.) Joshua, invade Canaan (Josh 1.) Gideon attack the Midianites (Jud 7:2.) God audibly called Samuel to be a prophet (1 Samuel 3.)  God told David were to go (2 Samuel 2: 1.) This pattern and explicit claim to the LORD speaking specific things continued through the recognized prophets, time and time again. The means of these interactions are often unclear, but the Bible makes the claim that the LORD (or an ‘angel of the Lord’) was telling something specific to a human being. Often times these revelations as depicted in scripture were accompanied by some miraculous manifestation and/or powerful personal appearance which often inspired great fear (which required reassurance to the hearer, i.e. ‘Fear not…’) The book of Nehemiah has none of this—anywhere. Yet preachers preach as though Nehemiah had heard from God even though the text itself makes no such claim. This is just plain dishonest.

Ezra 1 makes the claim that the LORD ‘stirred up the spirit of Cyrus king of Persia’ which led to a proclamation to commission and fund the rebuilding of the temple in Jerusalem. I’ll offer that the benefit of the doubt. However, the LORD himself remains silent throughout the book of Nehemiah. Nehemiah felt ‘shame’ concerning the state of Jerusalem’s walls and gates but there was no mention of God telling Nehemiah to go and rebuild them. Sure, Nehemiah prayed about it—but there was no recorded answer in the book accepted in the Protestant Canon. Why?

This is where human interest lifts its head. I propose that what happened in the compilation of Ezra and Nehemiah was to build a narrative to reforge an identity. What actually happened in history is a matter of much scholarly debate, but the return from exile narrative compiled in Ezra-Nehemiah seeks to establish an exclusive national identity. It was a matter of pride. (And control over the local population.)

Pastor Matt’s March 12, 2023 sermon assumes that God called Nehemiah to rebuild those walls and gates; Matt made it very clear that Nehemiah was responding to God’s call even though, to repeat, there is no record of God actually speaking in the book which records Nehemiah’s deeds. But because Nehemiah felt shame, prayed to God, and successfully garnered and organized the resources to accomplish the mission, it is assumed that it must have been God’s will—despite all the ‘difficulties’ I wrote about above.

Matt’s assumption fits perfectly into the charismatic understanding of how God communicates to us. This is how preachers can get up there to ask, ‘Hey, what are you passionate about?’ (Talk about herding cats…) What are people generally passionate about? The possibilities are seemingly endless. But not to worry, the machinery of appearance, language, pride, and self-interest regulates the whole mess in good part through what I talked about in an earlier post, the scapegoating mechanism. We must have somebody to blame for our problems—perceived or otherwise. This provides a way for us to divert and not look deeply into the consequences of our own beliefs and actions. Taking the assumptions which guide how Nehemiah is taught, what we think is our own agency, whatever we feel passionately about can now have God’s sanction. Just fill in the blank for whatever (within commonly accepted righteous guidelines of course) you desire. Awesome. So hey, you feel passionately about the unborn, right? Pray about it. Then step up to the plate, get involved, give money to the authoritarian organizations which claim to be pro-life. To hell with all the destruction, suffering, poverty, and death which comes from taking away women’s rights over their own bodies. Example one.

I know these arguments of mine anger righteous people, but time and again I’ve made the argument that pro-life people are not actually pro-life because the means they employ is mechanical, distant, willfully ignorant, dishonest, and authoritarian. The pro-life crowd doesn’t care much about those already born—that is a demonstrable fact. You may say (or feel that) you do but your collective political actions say otherwise by consistent evangelical Christian opposition to health care, education, and other social systems which alleviate poverty, mother and child mortality, crime, and other associated social and health care problems since those kinds of government interventions are almost universally regarded as bringing the evil of ‘socialism.’ (But what the hell, giving millions of dollars in taxpayer money to build an Ark Park in Kentucky is A-OK! That’s the Christian kind of socialism.) There is an inverse relation between mortality rates, poverty, and the relative strength of local abortion laws. That is shameful and this infuriates me.

Evangelicals try to enact these harmful laws in order to make themselves feel better. Making themselves feel like they are doing the will of God is what matters—if the plan is God’s will and/or if God himself has spoken is just assumed because Christians feel that it is. They won’t look at the measurable human results of what they are doing. Nope. Just pray about it. Your feelings, as formed and guided by your peers at church, on social media and the frauds at FoxNews, Focus on the Family, Hillsong, Salem Communications, or some silver-tongued, charismatic pastor, prophet, apostle, et. al., will be your guide. Those feelings rolling around in your heart and head are literally the voice of God—so says your preacher and the ubiquitous Christian culture which has just about everyone who thinks of themselves to be important saying, ‘the Spirit is saying to me X…’ or ‘the Lord has given me a word on my heart for you…’ thus putting the power and authority of God behind what the human assuming authority is saying. It’s dishonest. But it is all nicely concealed in pious language where the righteous adherent could cite the story of Nehemiah which shows that the strength and, better yet, the success (as we define it) of feeling and conviction proves that God has spoken. To hell with all the people who have been deeply hurt by this righteous charade. I do not believe the God of heaven intends for one person (or group) to lord over another person (or group.) We are all equally God’s children. Your observations, reasoning, and opinions are your own.

Addressing sermon point number two involves acknowledging the deep state of division in this country. Both Left and Right are calling each other fascists. This is how I see it: For example, the Right sees the Left as fascist because the Left defends the freedom and dignity of LGBTQ people to be accepted as they are. The righteous see LGBTQ people as so repulsive that it is an infringement upon their own sensibilities and ‘liberties’ that they should have to acknowledge and coexist with them. ‘Love the sinner, hate the sin’ is horseshit both philosophically and practically. Disgust blares throughout your national ‘conversation’ about our national downfall. You all are fooling yourselves if your honestly think that pithy little aphorism can hide the obvious scapegoating from those who are not you. As those who are not you see it, any policy, practice, or law which does not privilege the righteous, that is, white evangelicals, is defined as being fascist. This leaves us all very little to talk about with each other.

(One clear example of Christian privilege: The strongly demonstrable contributing ideology of white Christian nationalism was left out of the J6 committee’s report even though a lot of expert testimony was given, and it is a clear factor as social scientists have compiled volumes of evidence to support this claim. I think it safe to surmise that FoxNews would have picked the inclusion of that evidence in an official report to say something to the effect that not only is the demonic Left picking on poor Donald but also provide even more evidence that the Fake News Left just plain hates God and His chosen people. I think it is also safe to say that if Islamic ideology was a factor in the violence of that day there would have been volumes of testimony and analysis included in the report.)

The Left sees the right as fascist because what the Right is doing is demonstrably supremacist and exclusionary and this historically has led to violence; and they are not slowing down. For example, besides all the vitriol about eliminating transgenderism, which is people, concentration camps for homeless people, drag queens, the clearing of school libraries to suit the sensibilities of righteous folk, on and on…, righteous legislators in Florida have proposed Putin-imitating legislation which would require Bloggers who write about people in government there to register with the government, report income, or face penalties. That’s what Putin did in his country years ago and the Christian Right is trying to enact here. That’s just plain fascist as the righteous people are grasping at any power they can get their hands on. (And you all have the fucking audacity to talk in your sermons about listening to other people?!)

In sermon point number 2, Matt made it abundantly clear, that like Nehemiah, righteous people, having the sanction of God Almighty, have no obligation to address the concerns of critics. Those critics are ‘haters.’ As Matt said in minute 43, ‘the loudest boos come from the cheapest seats.’ (Fuck you, Matt.) So, you all are on a mission from God. I get it. Continuing in minutes 44 & 45, we learn that the only criticism the good Christian might have to listen to can only come from someone considered to be a brother or sister in Christ. (Do you really understand what you are saying?) Furthermore, the faithful are taught that criticism is to be chewed upon briefly like gum—if there is nothing there, the Holy Spirit will tell you if there is truth to this, spit it out. The message here is that the infinite number of things ‘God’ tells people to do, no matter how disparate, contradictory, exclusionary, and violent they may be, all, evidently, are equally true. As Matt made very clear, Nehemiah did not listen to his evil critics, righteous Nehemiah listened to God—even though nowhere in the text says that he was doing so. No matter.  

Build your fucking walls, enact your fascist laws to give a façade to righteousness. Call for the elimination of various people you are disgusting with. Decry godless socialism. Attack the school system with vouchers. Separate. Divide, Rebel. Fund lies. Offer completely wacked out sex advice. Stand for the flag, kneel for the cross. Privilege yourselves because only you are righteous and as such are worthy of having a voice. Might I remind you, that even in your sermon you acknowledged that Nehemiah’s prayer to bring down the wrath of God upon the ‘haters’ was not what Jesus would have done. (Matt taught in minute 49 that Jesus was not on the scene yet to teach what he taught—so that makes this kind of prayer to curse your enemies okay. Evidently, the ‘truth’ of God’s word changes.) Jesus on the cross said, ‘Father forgive them for they know not what they do.’ That is what Jesus did. But that’s not very personally empowering, is it? Neither is it safe. It is so much easier to defend the interests of yourself and your own group by demonizing your ‘opposition,’ as Nehemiah and Matt did. After all, the non-Spirit filled folk do not have the ‘answers’ as you do.

How human we are, right? We want to stick it to our enemies—the enemies of all that is good and true. This is why I see evangelicalism, the whole, rotten, corrupt, power-hungry, supremacist culture is rife with hypocrisy. You all follow Nehemiah’s example of leadership to grant special privileges to the righteous people while casting ‘the others’ who will not conform to your standards for what is human, thus deserving rights and recognition, out of the assembly of God. Just be reminded, again, that God, as recorded in your own Bibles, was silent in Nehemiah’s story. Yet in minute 50, Matt informs us that Nehemiah was seeking ‘the heart of God’ after he cited Nehemiah’s prayer calling down curses upon his enemies. That is seeking the heart of God? No Matt. Nehemiah is telling God what Nehemiah wants. God is silent in the text. No matter. Matt is twisting the text to suit the faithful’s desires which are making slaves out of the faithful. You are not freeing your flock, Matt; you are imprisoning them.

The evangelical is being actively taught that the internal thoughts and feelings of the individual are the voice of God. Critics like me who say, ‘Are you sure that’s God speaking?’ are ‘haters’ to be ignored. In minute 55 we learn that ‘the opposition will only be as loud as your internal insecurities allow them to be.’ (1) Reasoning and scholarship has nothing to do with knowing God’s will. (2) The strength of the feelings determines the certainty of God’s message. Therefore, be confident in your feelings that God has spoken (to you.) This should immunize the faithful against the questions of people like me who point out that the text does not say what the authority, in this case Matt, is assuming and teaching. To this critic, Matt exclaiming that Nehemiah was merely pointing the criticism up to God is not anywhere near as pious as it sounds; on the contrary, Nehemiah was (piously) claiming the authority of God who was, according to your own text, silent on the matter (even as Matt repeatedly claimed that Nehemiah was listening to God.) This kind of teaching, Matt, enables hucksters to pretend to hear from God, convey that ‘message’ from God, in gussied up pious language, to rally the troops to get with the program and support the building of the ‘kingdom.’ Millions have been deeply hurt, ripped off, and been taken advantage of because of this kind of teaching. In building the kingdom, we have built a violent, supremacist, furtive, conspiratorial, very tolerant of dishonesty, and authoritarian movement to save America for God which relies upon personal feelings of fear and desire to survive and flourish. And you Matt are directly feeding the beast with your dishonest teaching.

Now the faithful are free to feel like God has spoken even when supporting exclusion, hatred, violence, and oppression of ‘the others.’ After all, the righteous Nehemiah was completely okay with pulling the hair out of those who were not holy (Neh 13:25.) The process of ‘othering’ dehumanizes human beings. Once ‘othering’ is legitimized, the ‘pure’ folk become susceptible to the disgust and scapegoating mechanisms which leads to violence. I don’t believe one can pull the hair out of another human being without diminishing their humanity first. The teachings under the ideological umbrella of Christian Nationalism teach the faithful to ‘other’ human beings who are not seen as being part of the tribe. This is not love. Supporting nationalism is the antithesis of love. I do not recall Jesus teaching the Christian Nationalist approach to saving America for God. Christian Nationalists are appropriating the power of God to take what they want for themselves.

Don’t think you get a pass from me for not explicitly (that is, using clear, direct language) supporting Christian fascism, hiding behind the veil of plausible deniability. We are deeply, deeply divided on many matters including the opposing definitions of what love is. As I see the matter, you all teach a gospel of submission to your own superiority in order to experience a kind of dominionistic utopia on earth now and to be saved from the fires of hell after we die. I am ashamed for being fooled for so long; and this is why I am so passionate about opposing something so destructive to millions of people. But hey, why listen to me? I left the flock. I’m not worth of consideration according to your teaching. Regardless of what you all teach, this ex-vangelical believes that pretending there is no problem, as you Christians conceit to have the ‘answers,’ (as I once also believed) while upholding a man who made up a mission saying it was from God, which led to cruelty, separation, and violence as an ideal of Christian leadership, is just plain despicable. But hey, you have fears and anxieties to sooth and a world to conquer for Christ; that is, yourselves. You must be Christ-like and fight, fight, fight. I understand.  

Not Sexy but Very Rewarding

It has been said that deconstructing is merely the latest chic, sexy, thing to do. Yes, it seems to be the thing to do, but the common process involved in the millions of us leaving the church is not happening for the reasons some defensive evangelicals are framing up. It was not a temper tantrum; the process of the decision to leave was slow, deliberate, and painful. Now that I’m out, it is hard to accept that I really used to believe that hurtful stuff. Nobody likes admitting being wrong, but it is sure welcome to be free.

Ex-vangelicals are processing the admission of being wrong about something that was so central, (pardon the pun) so fundamental, to our being. It’s hard. Pulling back the curtain to reveal so much hurt, cruelty, and oppression, all done in the name of ‘love,’ in the name of Christ, to call the lost world and all the billions of people away from incurring the infinite wrath of a righteous God who will throw all those who will not say (or do) X, (What that X is is subject to much debate among the holy folk,) into the agony of fire forever, has been heart wrenching. I still follow what is being taught at my old church because there are people there whom I deeply care about. (And I like being informed.) Now that I better understand the ‘code’ and see the world through a new lens, what I am hearing and seeing appalls me. Those within that deeply fucked up system do not consciously understand how they are being harmed. (I was deeply, deeply harmed.) But they suffer as they innocently pray for deliverance from the fear and anxiety common ‘Christian’ teaching instills in them to keep them docile and compliant as the institution seeks to feed itself as it seeks to conquer the world for Christ.  

The whole mess is masked in the delusion that the institution of the church itself is that which will brings salvation to the world; people just need Jesus, the ‘answer’ to everything, and all would be well—under the inculcated assumption that the institution itself, the church writ large, is that which possesses ‘Jesus’ to dispense to the unwashed masses. With all its empty talk of unmerited grace and unconditional love, the demands of the institution itself by the very manner in which it is structured say something very different—you need to believe (and do) x, y, and z to be a Christian in good standing. Since the spoken message (of unmerited grace) is in direct conflict with the (power) structures governing acceptability which dispense those messages, the cognitive dissonance generated is just plain astounding. (A primary reason for this is because the infiltration of the ‘seven mountain mandate’ into just about everything evangelical; but that is not my focus here.) This dissonance in turn generates copious amounts of anxiety and/or misdirected rage which can either result in doubling down in ‘faith’ or, as my case eventually, rebellion. This is why we are so divided—those within the holy framework cannot see this dissonate dynamic and those outside it are appalled by its cultish vibe.

To the faithful, the message and understanding of grace and salvation is commonly understood in context of faithful acquiescence to the authority structures of the church. Those who question things, really anything outside of what that culture accepts, are wicked rebels. I used to think I could work within the system to persuade but the prevalent parishioner’s enthusiastic acceptance of the blatant authoritarianism and unquestioning demand of ‘whimsical’ Tim ultimately convinced me that was hopeless. ‘Authority’ is generated, in short, by stoking fear, generating threats, determining who’s in and who’s out, figuring who’s safe and who’s not, thus feeding the anxiety so that money can collected from the fearful to confront the threat, all while maintaining the appearance that you’re a nice, caring fellow who has the interests of the little people in mind—wash, rinse, repeat. The process of generating authority creates and feeds an ‘us and them’ mentality—this way of thinking bleeds out and infects every aspect of our culture.

There is so much money to be made throughout the whole process. FoxNews, as one example, is making a bloody fortune capitalizing on something the church actively feeds—you know, Culture War! The culture war is a great rallying point for all the various factions, who really have serious doctrinal differences with each other, to point their collective fingers at the ‘woke’, the liberals, the queers, as being the enemies of God and this Great Nation. (The funny thing is that if the righteous folk ever did eliminate the queer, woke evil doers, they would turn and rip each other to shreds for domination in a heartbeat. Humans have a constant need for an ‘other’ to serve as a scapegoat to relieve built up interpersonal tensions.) As more and more ‘agents of Satan’ fall away, the anxiety doubles again; the fact that a reason must be given to explain away something which ‘God’ said was going to happen but didn’t, guarantees dissonance, division, blame, scapegoating, and anxiety about whether Christians are going to ‘win’ the fight. Temper Tantrum Trump was anointed by God to fight. He lost. Deny, deny, deny. Double down in anger and frustration. Limit God by saying the forces of Satan were (and are) just too damn strong. Add to the little Christian’s shame by claiming they just didn’t have the faith to carry the fight to vanquish the forces of darkness. It’s about control.

Christians, your leaders prey on you; they manipulate you by using the ever-pervasive sense of threat to bolster the efforts of the power (and prestige) hungry to worm their way into ever more political control to ‘make America great again’ as one nation under the (Christian) God.’ They’ve fooled you into thinking you all will ‘rule and reign’ with them ‘under the lordship of Jesus Christ’ (Che Ahn) and it’s all going to be wonderful. (You all really should examine your motives.) Now that politics, business, and religion (three of the seven mountains) are well enmeshed in each other, the practical matter of what is in and what is out pushes, pulls, and feeds both upwards and downwards fueling the conflict between the controllers and the controlled. The vast Christian empire, the aspects of which I talk about in this blog, seeks to set the rules of the power game. Play the game, get rewarded. Cross the system, especially if you are a pastor, get cast out.

As I’ve said for many years, without fully comprehending the depth of that reality, the church is far more ‘American’ than it is ‘Christian.’ People just looked at me and rolled their eyes. ‘What is Mark not happy with now?’ What prolonged the inevitable was that I was an affluent, strong, tall, educated, white male. I strongly suspect that if had raised the kind of hell I raised as a woman, or as someone not in the dominate demographic, my protestations would have been met with a lot more open hostility. There is of course no way to test this idea. But judging by the whole system circles the wagons to protect itself, I believe this claim is not too far out there. As I’ve said time and time again, the church, with all its entanglements, its clear quest for power, works to keep everyone, I mean everyone, under the banner of its authority. Yet even the prophets and apostles have their constraints as to what they can pitch to the faithful. Brilliantly, the New Apostolic Reformation system has devised a way to both uphold and share power with each other. Individual pastors working in churches both big and small have less ability to question the vastly interconnected and capitalized system because they have a living to make. Push too hard, question too much, the faithful will fire you. The extensive system regulates itself quite well. (C. Peter Wagner was an organizational genius.) The system rewards assholes because, let’s be honest, it takes an asshole to claim apostolic authority over other people. (The funny thing, the assholes likely even believe their own shit.) The people not only are conditioned to accept the authority of assholes but to love those assholes for showing them the way to power. Trump, by far the biggest, most egregious, open and unashamed asshole ever to be embraced, and even worshipped (golden Trump at CPAC for example,) by the Christian establishment to save American for God is my cited proof that that. The people expect that it will take an asshole to save because they want certainty of victory over all those they’ve been trained to fear; assholes deliver that (sense of) certainty. When the whole fucking thing implodes into violence (like January 6th) the apostolic authorities (namely Dutch Sheets) can just shamelessly blame the ubiquitous demonic powers for the violence implying that faithful were just not committed enough to carry out the wishes of a very limited God. Inject more anxiety, foster more fear and an ever-present sense of inadequacy. Double-down, have faith (in us,) we are winning, so say all the assholes supposedly anointed by God to say so.

It is so hard to admit we are wrong. Nobody wants to admit it else the whole system would crash. (And I would say that the accelerating ex-vangelical movement is clear evidence of the growing awareness of the church’s depravity. The local rhetoric of ‘God is doing mighty things in our church’ seeks to bolster the morale of those who remain faithful against the fear of impending collapse.) This cycle of anxiety, rage, and doubling down ensures that the most depraved amongst us, those willing to support (or not confront) common lies, will remain in power to maintain the dominant demographic’s sense of comfort, righteousness, and superiority.

The other survival technique for pastors lower down in the power structure is just to pretend there is nothing wrong with the whole fucked up system. Enter my old church—Centralia Church of the Nazarene. No evangelical church is immune—the power of Christian media, the larger evangelical culture entwined with a business model (Purpose Driven Life—Church, yada, yada) and a reliance upon attaining political power to fulfill the purposes of God, infects the whole mess. It’s all culture war now. (On the 8th day God created an asshole who will shit on everyone who is not among the chosen.) For the lowly pastor, it’s conform or be kicked out. Confront only that which is safe to confront. Use the common, fill-in-your-own-blank language to spur the congregation towards Jesus’ goals. Never ever be pointed, specific, or truly confrontational. This, finally, brings me to a sermon delivered in my old haunt on February 5th, 2023. Preface over; let’s talk about self-preservation.

The multi-part sermon series I’m going to address today is entitled Blueprint; Belong, Believe, Become, Serve. The nationalist, charismatic sector of the church is ‘growing’ all for the wrong reasons. The church is a product that promises power. It pitches a relief in response to the anxiety it generates. Starting in minute 48, the pastor repeats the trope that Christians are persecuted. That is false but it is useful to the institution seeking to feed and empower itself. The church is concentrating and radicalizing as the fear of ‘replacement,’ thanks Tucker Carlson and FoxNews, builds. Oh, the poor American Christian, oppressed by drag queens, and abortionists… What we need in response is strong leaders. (People like DeSantis who will bring down the wrath of God against ‘those’ people? You don’t say.)  We need to assemble the ‘resources necessary’? To do what exactly? What specifically are these ‘resources’ Matt? Oh, you don’t say. Culture warriors, feel free to fill that in as you see fit. Power, power, power.

49:30 The notion that everyone is a ‘minister’ is a crock. I know Paul says that, but my standard for a minister are a bit higher. Those ‘spiritual’ ministers who advocate for the power of nationalism are wrecking balls. To them, the specific doctrines concerning the nature of the trinity, the atonement, eschatology, etc., are not anywhere as important as important as acquiring the power necessary to end non-existent Christian oppression. You repeated it yourself Matt, Christians are oppressed. You are affirming what the whole Christian machine teaches Christians to fear. You are supporting a massive lie in support of the quest for power. People naturally will believe and act in ways to protect themselves; Jesus, to my recollection, did not teach this approach to ministry. Jesus laid down his power; he hung out with the marginalized. The ‘Family,’ ‘Focus on the Family,’ Salem Communications, the Council for National Policy, as facilitated in smokey backrooms, and ‘open’ events such as the ‘National Prayer Breakfast,’ will make damn sure all Christians are afraid. We must make ‘the others’ submit to us to contain the threat. You reinforce this trope of oppression for your own preservation.

49:45 What I do is think. All those years I just felt something was dreadfully wrong. I made predictions based on observations of character which came to pass. I confronted things that I did not fully understand that now I thump myself on the head saying ‘duh!’ Hillsong, for example, is a cesspool. Such a system begs for exploitation and corruption. And that is what happened. I knew that when I heard in Sunday School that Trump was anointed by God to save America that Trump was a total wrecking ball sack of shit that the GOP would eventually love to jettison for a more appropriate, and smarter, fascist like DeSantis. I just felt, even when I had young daughters that I wanted to protect, that purity culture is horrifying, terribly destructive, and demonstrable that it does not achieve its stated objective—it cripples people sexually—especially females. (Still kicking myself for not opposing it even more than I did.) Hell, I called the MOPS implosion. I knew Dave was in deep shit for trying to minister to everyone ‘riding on the edge of the coin’ as COVID was helping to radicalize everything. I called these matters based upon judgement of character while I was still an ‘insider.’ But I was perceived as just another malcontent. So much for ‘thinking.’ Sit down, shut up, send money.

49:50 Play your role? What was my role, Matt? Am I mad? Yes. I put two decades and 10% of my income into the church. A part of me wishes I could have that time and money back. I was faithful! My ‘spheres of influence’? (Sounds like NAR language to me.) Again, I think. There are people in your church I care about deeply. They are being misled into supporting something that is both vampiric and supremacist. No, I’m not mad about not having power within my old church. I don’t want power. Games disgust me. I say what I think regardless of whether it will gain me standing. I positioned my life to be able to make a living without having to play games. I want all people (regardless of relation to the church) to be free from oppression—church oppression. I was free to play my role if I did not question too much. To be faithful, the ‘role’ is to obey, shut up, send money.

50:40 ‘Listen as they tell their story’? Who are you kidding? (This smacks a bit Timmish.) What do we get constantly on FoxNews? Invasion at the border, right? Fear brown people. Fear queer people. Fear liberals who hate God and want to destroy the country. That is the Christian culture Matt. Sam Perry, sociologist, categorizes the level of involvement in the program of Christian Nationalism as ambassadors, accommodators, resistors, and rejectors. 75% of evangelicals surveyed are in the first two categories. Resistor is what I was, rejector is what I am now. The strength of these nationalistic convictions is concentrating and radicalizing the evangelical church as the resisters lose hope and leave to become ex-vangelicals. There is nothing in your sermon which even remotely addresses this reality.

I know from experience that certain topics are not okay to bring up with an evangelical. There are expectations, rules, because that which threatens our existence as good people is ever present. This is embedded in our everyday language—we don’t understand how to listen to things which are foreign to our list of ‘acceptable’ sins. We can talk about things like adultery, divorce, drinking, and anger issues because those are the kinds of things we do (and hence accept.) But things which lie outside of the conservative, straight, white, heterosexual context? Nope. Our culture is saturated with violent spiritual warfare rhetoric concerning those who seek to destroy the ‘purity’ of the nation. The empire of Focus on the Family has embedded racist coded phrases like ‘welfare queens’ into our brains. (The ‘beauty’ of Trump was that he would say the quiet parts out loud to our garish delight.)

Judgment, that which permeates all Christian thought, dominates. God helps those who help themselves—this is a very common Christian belief as it forms a basis for conservatism. Anyone who should dare question the Dobsonian claims concerning a woman’s true place or say that it is abusive to teach that the fate of the nation lies in the sexual purity of young, female bodies is an enemy of God’s plan. Dare say the faithful should abide hearing a story of someone deeply wounded by purity culture, or by the constant anxiety generated by all the ‘Left Behind’ bullshit. What about being confronted with the doctrine of eternal conscious torment? Heaven forbids they be theologically literate about Christian history and conversant in the various theories of the atonement. People get defensive when they are epistemologically threatened. Better to just stick with the expectations of Christian appearance and defend the indefensible.  

Continuing the listening to them theme, people, for another example, are unlikely to reveal to an evangelical about how they got diddled by a religious authority figure. If they did, the walls would go up in a micro-second about how the perpetrator was not really a Christian. After all Matt, you were very clear to inform the people, reiterating several times, that, ‘Without Christ, our hearts are desperately wicked.’ (A clear supremacist message by the way which would be affirmed by the faithful as God’s Truth, like it or not, in an instant. Although where the bar of ‘acceptability’ in terms of wickedness is set is subject to endless debate hence then the constant anxiety for those whose consciences are a bit more fragile. This is an excellent control mechanism to be exploited by those who think very highly of themselves and their relationship with the Almighty. Name it and claim it, I suppose.) How does this facilitate the faithful’s listening to the stories of the wicked others? It doesn’t do that very well at all. Those ‘others’ must remain within our cultural wheelhouse, that is, not perceived to be threatening, and certainly not ‘icky,’ to be hearable.

I’ll go on… How should one hear the story about other kinds of abuse one suffered at hands of Christians? This is very common. It’s my story. I’ve ‘righteously’ hurt others using supremacist language and other pious bullshit. How could the faithful hear a story about those disillusioned by the corruption and cover-ups with the church? That is a common refrain I’ve heard from the ‘others.’ This is a relevant moral concern, yet they, without Christ, are desperately wicked? (Mix in a little Calvinist nonsense about ‘common grace’ perhaps?) How should the conservative faithful listen to someone who is ‘not us’ share stories about being hurt by racism? Deny, deny, deny. That would make us look bad. What about LGBTQ issues—the hurts, threats, fears, ridicule, insults, and assaults? Response? It is your own damn fault for being a traitor to nature. Right? If everyone is a minister and is, as such, speaking for God, then the denial of racism, the disgust for queer people, and just, plain gaslighting on a host of issues carries with it a measure of God’s authority. Do you really wonder why so many of the ‘lost’ do not want to hear anything from the people of God? Oh yeah, it’s just because ‘those people’ are wicked; ‘they don’t have the light of truth that we have.’

The culture of Christian Nationalism, which is thoroughly infused in the church, teaches people to not react well to the above conversations. Such conversations are a threat to Christian perceptions of how the world ought to be. Christian politics, fear, and cultivated anxiety conditions thoughts and actions towards fighting the culture war. The stories of those who do not share the conservative worldview threaten the sense of how loving evangelical Christians believe they are. Christians are cheering laws which seek to silence marginalized from talking about things which offend us. Clearly supremacist. Not listening. Not loving. The Christian posture separates. Listen to their stories? In our world, they must either conform to becoming us, or remain silent and unseen. That is what we collectively do to the marginalized through political force. We cheer it to ‘save America!’ (To reach the holy folk, even Trump must make claims that he can be a bigger asshole than DeSantis to remain relevant.) You would not dare to bring any inkling of these kinds of things up because your people would fire you in a heartbeat.

Tim, CentNaz’s interim pastor, an apt example of a total asshat, claimed that he loved to talk with ’10 out of 10’ difficult people concerning the faith. I don’t believe him. Right off, he made it clear in a sermon how he handled having his authority questioned; message sent, ‘don’t cross me.’ This even pissed my wife off; a feat since she is much more charitable than I am. Well, I crossed him anyway and he was not happy. He even preached a sermon about people finding faults and ‘sniffing armpits’ (looking right at me as I scowled right back. Fuck you, Tim.) He made the claim that what the Bible teaches is clear. It is anything but clear. What he was really saying was, ‘I am the authority; what I say the Bible says is what the Bible says.’ One authoritarian asshole coming through I could abide, but the people of the church seemed to love what that asshole had to say. Since Tim made it clear that he was into the culture war, political activism and what not, it became abundantly clear that I did not share the same values with the people I’d been with for 20 years. I was nothing but a thorn.

The reason I bring all this up is that the religion which supposes itself to be international and cross-cultural, is not—at least not in the United States. Tim’s epistemology was not threatened by me at all, but his authority sure was. He is a common example—I’ve crossed these kinds of people my whole life. I remember how I used to talk when I was ‘in-the-club’ and I am so sorry to all those I hurt. As an apologetics expert I had the ‘answers.’ I believed—until the depravity of evangelicalism made itself abundantly clear to me. What I thought was love, wasn’t. What I thought was grace, wasn’t. Now I must forgive myself and find a new path.

There are good evangelical people who probably have enough charity in their hearts to have a cross-cultural conversation, but they are not the ones who are going to be spurred on by a mention in a sermon to listen to the stories of others. They are already doing it while keeping it on the down-low that they are either not ‘all in’ on the Christian Nationalism thing or do not understand what it is and the extent of nationalism’s power and influence. These ‘resisters’ increasingly are heading out of the evangelical church as they are losing hope. The ex-vangelicals are waking up to meet almost instant disapproval in polite company, those conversations which threaten ‘Christian’ authority and/or epistemology. Without confronting the supremacy, the bigotry, the fear, the anxiety, the lies, the conspiracies, the hatred, the authoritarianism, the arrogance, the xenophobia, etc., contained within Christian Nationalism then the appeals to listen to the stories of others will only achieve the same results as it had in the past—concentration and radicalization. How to confront all this while keeping the peace? Beats me. All I know is that I’m not going to shut up.

Few are going to mention, let alone confront, that which roams about in conversations, radio programs, Podcasts, sermons, FoxNews, InfoWars, Facebook, Christian music, etc., to mold the anxious Christian mind for even more fear and exploitation. Who is for sin? Culture war stuff is a multi-Billion-dollar industry. Pretending the culture war itself does not injure people (Fact: it kills lots of people) by inspiring verbal and physical violence is, in my world, depraved. The culture warrior believes the violence is justified. By not confronting all the various things concerning human interactions listed above, I see the matter of remaining silent as being an endorsement of the current state of lies, conspiracies, and exploitation which, as a demonstrably practical matter, lead to more violence. No worries—all that is justifiable to save the world for Jesus. After all, all we need is Jesus. Say the sinner’s prayer. Use the right vocabulary. Believe the right things. Support the right causes. All of this follows because we’ve found Jesus. Jesus fixes everything. True belief, healing, and good conduct follow. The ‘Prince of Peace’ is ‘all in’ for discrimination, cruelty, and violence as such things will eventually fix things to the degree that Jesus can then come back and have mercy on whom he has mercy. So, get on board so Jesus’ Dad doesn’t burn you in hell forever. Better to be an asshole than in agony.

51:08 How has God shaped me? Well, let me see here…Let me tell my story. Violent childhood. Endured physical, sexual, emotional, and spiritual abuse. I have no idea how many times I was whipped, degraded, and screamed at. The Bible was weaponized against me. Lots of guilt and shame. Terrified of going to hell. Raised on ‘Thief in the Night.’ Time, and again, bouts of terror that I’d missed the rapture when someone wasn’t where they were supposed to be. My grandfather was a great counter to all this crap, he was always good to me; I wouldn’t have made it without him. Tried to kick God out of the universe because the young me thought that most adult Christians (other than my grandfather) are assholes. Said and did anything to get into as many female shorts as I could—hence, I was an asshole. Didn’t really understand anything much about sacrificial love until I met a woman I eventually fell in love with. She was deeply broken like me. Although we began the relationship for the wrong reasons, I came to see her as a human being as she eventually revealed her hurt to me. It rocked my world, a woman seen as my equal, both in great pain. She ended up breaking my heart. Because of all the damage we did to each other in the early part of our relationship, and as we both grew personally (and I was trying to get my career started and hence was working a lot) she came to realize that it was not going to work. Splitsville. I sincerely hope she is having a good life.

Due to my lack of success in becoming an atheist, the fear of hell still dominated my heart and mind and so I came to the sinner’s prayer, and (due to all the religious trauma) again and again, countless times. I started to feel guilty about all the people I had hurt. God’s judgement fell upon me time and again. The language of grace was there but what I didn’t understand until decades later crippled the message. I studied apologetics and theology trying to make sense of what I mistakenly thought was the only game in town for avoiding the fires of hell. I had no idea the depth of the teaching’s cruelty. In all this, I was also desperate to be loved but resolved myself to rise above the priority of just getting laid. I tried not to let my desperation screw up my next relationship. The next woman I became intimate with was my beautiful wife to whom I’ve been married almost 30 years. She is God’s gift to me.

 She taught me what love is. She stood beside me as I processed my trauma. And I did the same for her. That’s what love is. It’s not judgement, or fear of rejection, or punishment, or shaming—it’s walking beside. Christians tell these kinds of stories, but the foundations all descend to judgment and punishment. I adore my wife. I wanted to be a better man for her and our children, yet as much as I tried to be that man I still said and did things I am not proud of. A good number of these things stemmed from what I was taught that good Christian men should do. Yet, I must give myself grace because my intentions were good even though I was doing harm. I can honestly say that I didn’t come anywhere close to passing on to my children what my parents did to me—and for that I am proud.

Jesus doesn’t fix anything (but I hope that he walks beside.) For decades I studied theology and apologetics trying to shoehorn the Bible into the evangelical model. But all I was reading were evangelical texts. Little, if anything, fit. I’d been saying for years that American Christianity seemed much more American than it did Christian, but I didn’t appreciate the depth of that depravity until the Christians threw their enthusiastic support behind Trump to save America. I could no longer try to trick myself into believing (evangelical) Christianity was about helping people—it is primarily about exploitation and power. All couched in bullshit language about caring for people. It’s a sham.

I was working tons of overtime to put my daughter through law school; that was my priority which greatly slowed down my actual exit from the church. I still hoped that perhaps when given the opportunity I could talk people out of the depravity of Christian Nationalism. But as I became more and more ‘liberal’ the less and less persuasive I became. Then there was Tim. Then we all worshipped the flag in the sanctuary to honor the veterans. I walked out. After that, my wife relented and did not fight to keep my coming to that church. Hello freedom.

It is remarkable how happy I’ve become once I let all that go. So how did God shape me into what I am today? If you suppose that the evangelical is the cat’s meow to introduce people to the Jesus that fixes everything, that evangelicalism is the proper expression for worshipping and honoring God then it seems a demon got a hold of me (which has been openly said) to pull me away from obedience to God. Once saved, always saved? Nobody really believes that. I still meet with and run into people from the church—I positively assume they are sad about me leaving but no one so far has asked me why. I had to demand a letter of release and an exit interview. Since I was someone always questioning this, that, or the other thing, am I free to assume there was some relief in the departure of a troublemaker? Do they suppose I’m lost? Regard me a selfish sinner who is not a team player? I can only speculate.

I still believe in God, but I don’t believe in the evangelical church because I firmly believe it does more harm than good—even a relatively tame church like Centralia Nazarene. It does more harm than good because of all the simply screwed up beliefs and practices which float around in the evangelical universe—things the local church couldn’t immunize itself against even if they were aware of such things and wanted to confront them. A plethora of harmful teachings are simply baked into the culture. Far from abandoning God, I’m reading works from liberal theologians, black theologians, theologians who are commonly regarded as heretics, along with sociologists, secular scholars of religion, psychiatrists, to see an entirely different world in which God is not an asshole—I don’t have to defend the doctrine of eternal conscious torment, the Canaanite Invasion, or that God who just flips out every now and then to kill a bunch of people. If it was a ‘demon’ (I doubt it) who steered me into this belief, I would thank him. If it was God, I would thank whoever and whatever he, she, they, or it is.

Thankfully I no longer must believe the Bible is literally true. The whole ‘literal’ shtick was always pick and choose anyway—there was no way to make sense of it anyway otherwise. We make the God we want; fundamentalists do this despite their protestations to the contrary—they propose a God who clearly plays favorites. I (the heretic) want(s) a God who has love for everyone, not just the chosen few. I want a God who does not need to kill or torture anyone—including His Son. Heresy, I know. I want a God who would not design a system of thought which fills its adherents with fear and anxiety while claiming to be the solution to the same. Men did that. I want a God who considers all people, I mean everyone, as equally being the children of the divine. Although the fear of hell was so fully inculcated into me at a young age, despite all the doctrines surrounding the sadistic teaching which don’t make a lick of sense, it is hard to suppose enjoying my eternity with an personal entity who must burn people I love for that eternity because they didn’t do, believe, or say the right things to be freed from the wickedness which seals that fate. (Yes, I am familiar with the basic theories of atonement. I’ve considered the various arguments concerning how the ‘get out of hell free’ card is issued.) I imagine I could say, ‘well, this thoroughly sucks, but it is better than burning myself’; or I could be transformed into righteously thinking they fully deserve that fate to then skip happily along on the golden streets of heaven. The more I thought about it, the more twisted and sicker the doctrine appears to me. If this makes me wicked in your eyes, so be it. I don’t worry about the authorities anymore because I truly and honestly believe the common doctrines espoused by evangelicalism are not true. Thank God.

Salvation lies not in espousing certain ‘correct’ beliefs whipped up by some men who have serious control and vengeance issues. Our limited nature makes reliance on correct epistemology fraught with peril. I spent decades trying to get it right—turns out I was barking up the wrong tree. Thank you, Peter Enns and Obery Hendricks! Apologetics is mostly bullshit. Still wavering between annihilationism and universal reconciliation but even if I should be heading to oblivion, I am grateful for my life now. I still give daily thanks to God for wife, daughters, friends, health, wealth, life, and love. I hang around with liberal Christians, those the culture warriors see as traitors to the faith, hoping that I meet a different Jesus than what the evangelicals pitched to me. The rainbow flag is that which truly says all are welcome. I’m sorrowful for what I used to believe and say. I take the elements of communion with them. I find meaning in the solidarity of responsive prayer, and in the ceremonies demonstrating gratitude and awe. I want to believe.

I have a lot to unpack still, but that’s my story. I’m deeply wounded through years of religious abuse. I’ve clearly said some things which make me a heretic whom John Calvin would have burned to righteously defend the faith—as he did to Michael Servetus. I doubt anyone from my old haunt would care to engage—too much of a threat. There are millions of people just like me who’ve been deeply wounded by Christians and the church. There are millions of others who just by observing in general all the trauma religion generates leads them to conclude such a thing couldn’t be from God, hence they don’t believe. I recommend not trying to convince your targets that those hurtful people weren’t true Christians. I’ve heard this many times; doing this is very condescending and disingenuous. The evangelical theological system itself is rotten, it hurts and sours good people by teaching people to say and do very hurtful things in the name of God.  I do not wish you all success.

51:40 ‘Because we have the power of God’? It’s not love we’re talking about here. Do you not think about how Christians commonly connect the power of God with political power? It is an ugly fact. This is a fine example of how the theology of power which come out of Christian Nationalism (and the prosperity gospel which richly fertilized the soil in which Christian nationalism grew) permeates our everyday thought and language. Evangelicals, I believe, arrogantly appropriate the power of God for themselves much like they’ve appropriated the stars and stripes, and various Jewish sacred objects, to suit their own purposes. The practical result of doing this creates a serious separation between human beings. But that is what holiness basically is, right? Christians are supposed to listen to the ‘lost’s’ stories so that a proposal can hopefully be made to the prospect that ‘the power of God’ could be bestowed on the prospect to fix the problems which cause the suffering. Thanks to the prosperity gospel, faithful Christians promise power in exchange for faith. Never mind all the charlatans who rip people off by promising the ‘power of God’ to heal them from x, y, or z. Never mind all the failed prophecies given by means of the ‘power of God’ that this, that, or the other thing was going to happen—but didn’t. It is a demonstrably false gospel in its most obvious form, but ‘softer’ evangelicals pitch a more palatable, watered-down version to people hoping to escape their suffering. Scientific approach to easing suffering is often poo-pooed—and in more extreme (yet common) cases, we’re not just talking about therapy and psychiatry here but vaccines and masks in the face of an epidemic which killed millions! Don’t you believe in the ‘power of God!’ ‘This is a matter of our basic freedoms!’ I simply do not believe that when humans appropriate the ‘power of God’ for themselves that God just relents and lets them use that power in whatever manner the human sees fit. What Would Jesus Do? Right?

Furthermore, suppose someone does convert to claim that power for healing x, y, or z. What if, after much prayer and godly counseling, that person does not heal? Who’s to blame? In cases of PTSD for example, the various brain waves from different areas of those who suffer this do not flow in sync with one another as they do in a non-traumatize person. They are literally not of one mind. There was a whole series of electro-chemical changes which happened because of stress which led to their current suffering. That is why they can be easily triggered into a flight or fight response. They need serious medical help but due to our ‘will over matter,’ ‘power of God’ stuff how many of these people forego treatment to pray their way out of it? I shudder to think of how many dead people I saw throughout my career who had killed themselves could have been saved if they’d been offered the scientific help they needed.

A little bit of advice Christian… quit offering people power. Power corrupts. To the extent the church helps people, it is because of the experience of solidarity, community, and love. Power is disconnected. Love is connected. Offer all people love without judgement or expectation. Love them enough to wear a mask or take a vaccine to protect them. With all the vitriol about ‘freedom,’ Christians have shown the world their love of others. Fuck ‘em—it’s about MY FREEDOM. Oh yeah, and how ‘bout, ‘Don’t spread lies which literally kill people’? Oh, don’t worry, you did your own research (from shit that emerged from 4-chan or from Trump’s sack-of-shit, lying face?) How about, ‘listen to people’s hurts even if it hurts you?’ You know, even if you are offended—even if you believe it is not holy? How about being open to admitting fault when you’re shown to be wrong? Oh, no, no, no… ‘We speak for God. How could we be wrong?’ Can Christians be willing to hear histories they don’t like—even ones that make the white race look less like the noble saviors of the rest of humanity? I do not believe they are willing. Will Christians jettison their fear of the others? Again, no. They will reward the ever-indignant Tucker Carlson for telling them exactly what they want to hear. (Going into this would require a discussion of Rene’ Girard’s mimetic theory and the scapegoat mechanism. Some other time.) The others are a threat to the purity of this nation. They dilute the pure message with ‘wokism,’ you know, demonic liberalism. The comforting echo chambers are well established. The church firmly believes it is righteous in its mission. I do not hold hope that the evangelical church is ever going to agree with anything other than seeking ever more power. This will continue until it is a smoking heap of ash. Ever read the Old Testament?

52:00 ‘Let God do His part’? Continuing on the power theme… What is God’s part in terms of the evangelical program of healing, restoration, and salvation? Does God force his will or not? Prevenient grace? Softer. This is related to a phenomenon that has always bothered me, ‘God told me such and such’; or even better, ‘God told me to tell you such and such.’ Really? Damn you’re important. So, you’ve listened, maybe said a few kind words to whoever needs the power of God we possess. Okay, now we’ll just step back and let God do his thing. What? Shall we suppose that since we the dispensers of God’s power and we ran into a hurting person whom we spent a little time with, that God will now move into that person’s life? Either you believe in irresistible grace, or you don’t. The practical effect of this teaching gives people space, which is a good thing. But, the big but, God, according to Wesleyan doctrine, does not force irresistible grace upon anyone. Nor, as it says in scripture, which Nazarenes generally accept as infallible (in their original forms of course,) God does not show favoritism. It also says in scripture that Christians are the hands of God, meaning, metaphorically, that lost people will come to know the love of God through Christian practical expressions of love for the lost. (Er…, to be clearer, personal expressions of loving action is what the Bible seems to teach in places about witnessing, but that’s not what Christian Nationalism teaches the faithful about how to save the planet through the ‘loving’ expressions of power to regulate the wicked—to God’s Glory, of course. There is direct conflict here which must be diverted and/or ignored.) So, as I understand the matter, according to your own scriptures, the faithful Christian should be both wise and generous in expressing love and charity to others without backing off too far. The inclination towards the appropriation of God’s power changes this dynamic. Just pray and release the power. All then will work itself out. Convenient.

I happen to believe that whatever religion you hold, atheist or whatever, all people are capable of love, compassion, charity, honesty, whatever. I, along with Roger Williams 300 or so years ago (who got kicked of Puritan society for saying this,) believe that pagans, non-white and otherwise, often have better moral codes than white Christians do. I think this is because of the corruption due to the white Christian’s sense of superiority, and its acquisition of political (and military) power. Today we have all kinds of self-proclaimed prophets and apostles running about jabbering about how we all are about to see God do his thing while whipping up Jericho marches filled with knuckleheads blowing shofars and flying flags. January 6th, and all that surrounded that lovely little show of violent rage led by Christians, was supposed to result in a ‘mighty wind of revival’ blowing across the nation. It didn’t. Millions of us are absolutely disgusted by Christian behavior. What a wonderful witness to love that was, wasn’t it? In fear of this falling away (instead of the promised revival) the church again doubles-down, denies, diverts, projects, concentrates and radicalizes. Trump was anointed by God, Christians have been told, therefore opposing Trump is opposing God. Eventually the prophets and apostles get together to figure out how to convince Christians that God changed his mind—DeSantis Yeah! There is powerful mass psychology at work here. Anxious people want assurance. Disappointed people want revenge. Nobody wants to admit they’re wrong. Few within evangelical circles are willing to talk about not only what went wrong with that grasp for power, but the immorality of such a grasp, for fear of being excommunicated. Community is powerful. The few who did were fired. According to the apostles, the story goes, Christians just didn’t generate enough power to accomplish God’s Will—this is why the demonic forces carried the day. Next time, keep the faith slackers!

Human reliance upon power brings lies, violence, and rebellion. If you Christians really wanted a positive revival, then abandon the quest for power and start loving people. Pastors start teaching people to let go of their power, and all the nonsense, the conspiracies, the lies. Then perhaps God, whom your scriptures say is love, can then truly do his thing. (But, oh, yeah, pastors, ah, you’d lose your jobs…)

53: 45. ‘Are you in?’ No. One of the Podcasts I listen to are The New Evangelicals. Tim, I like this Tim, used to be drummer for an evangelical church. Tim started questioning the morality Christian Nationalism and the church’s enthusiastic support for a dirt-bag; so, he started a Podcast and started openly questioning things. As it gained traction and the church took notice, Tim was told by leadership, ‘Are you in? Either you stop what you’re doing, or you can’t work for us anymore.’ Tim followed his conscience and quit working for the church.

‘Are you in?’ is a loaded statement; it is more than a simple question. Did not Jesus say something to the effect, ‘those who deny me before men, I will deny before my father’? Since the church acts as the intermediary between God and man, if you are ‘not in’ with the stated mission to save the lost then perhaps your eternal destiny could be imperiled by your refusal to acquiesce? ‘Are you in’ is a call to obedience to follow the church’s program. I understand that’s how groups work, and things get done. But life, people, relationships are far more complicated than something like a football game which has clearly defined rules, goals, and limits. Am I in for using political power to accomplish Christian goals? I know you are not directly saying this here but it is implied since it is what the evangelical church supports in general, so again, no. Am I in for believing the supremist doctrine that, ‘without Christ, our hearts are desperately wicked’? Along with all the other things I wrote about above, a big hearty no. You don’t get to have my loyalty anymore.

54:18 ‘Learn…’ Yep. But not too much so that you’ll start questioning.

54:38 ‘Go… Serve.’ Depends what you mean by serve…

55:09 ‘Give….’ Not to what I think hurts people. ‘Unstoppable vision…’ I hope not.

58:30 ‘Strip out the selfishness.’ Here is how I see that statement… The evangelical political/religious coupling is selfish to its core—to maintain a sense of comfort, safety, supremacy. What is being said here is to fully affirm (‘Are you in?’) how the church is doing its business to save your neighbor, America, and by extension the world, for God. If you fail to support how we do business with your time and money, or even question how we are doing ‘God’s work,’ then you are selfish.

59:00 If God himself has shaped what the evangelical church is then God is an asshole. I don’t believe that I’m calling God himself an asshole here because I believe that it was (and is) men who believed they represent God who shaped the church. There is a big difference there which church leaders conveniently conflate to their own benefit. Decent, loving people within the church exist in large numbers but they are being abused and misled by a corrupt system devised by authoritarians.

59+ ‘We have the answers’? ‘Are you in?’ Mold me, shape me, use me. I give my life into the potter’s hands. (I used to be moved by that song.) Have a role to play? You know I still would like to be of use to the Almighty? You know I still desire that? Why? I have had good, lasting relationships with people in the church. I miss the community. But I had to look behind the curtain. I had to study and ask questions to find all the games and cover-ups. Question all the bullshit like, ‘the Spirit is telling me right now…’ It’s just a power play disguised as piety to get people to do what you want. All the corruption. All the lies. All the theology that is harmful and oppressive. The quest for power over others… I don’t see love in this.

Answers to what? What are the questions? How to be free? From what? The wrath of God? The fires of hell? Few people are going to read this, but I have this to say to you—the evangelical church is an enormous weight. If you want to be free, leave. It’s on my top ten list of the best things I ever did.

Find love. Find someone who loves and accepts you for who you are. Someone who does not play games, is willing to question, challenge, and explore. I believe God is both out there and right here. Although we try, we don’t get to define who God is. I find comfort in that because men can be terrifying, oppressive, and cruel to each other; the gods they define reflect this. I believe God just is. And I hope that one day when my body assumes room temperature, my spirit (if God wills it) will find something akin to sharing a lovely meal on a warm, spring day in the company of my beloved. Love is heaven.

Oppressive Teaching

Count it all joy, my brothers, when you meet trials of various kinds, for you know that the testing of your faith produces steadfastness. And let steadfastness have its full effect, that you may be perfect and complete, lacking in nothing. James 1: 2-4

It is common for the Evangelical to hold the belief that suffering ultimately works to benefit the believer as the above excerpt from James exemplifies. As it also common to believe that a good part of this suffering comes as a result of faith in Christ (2 Timothy 3: 12.) This has led to the common martyr complex exhibited by many American Christians today which supposes the satanic, woke, leftist culture is what oppresses the average Christian. This myth persists giving sanction for the current political imperative for Christians to ‘take back’ the United States for God. Evangelical teaching, having come out of a long tradition of maintaining the institution of white supremacy (justifying hierarchy and segregation for economic gain and political stability,) has built a system of thought to protect the money-making institution (the church) itself by convincing the faithful that their suffering is the result of wicked people outside the church. Poppycock. The church itself is the oppressor. Here is my case…   

To be human means we must face suffering. The ever-present question remains in how to morally face (and combat) suffering in ourselves and others. We categorize and separate, scapegoat, blame, shift, obfuscate, and divert the sources, relations, and domains of our suffering in attempts to avoid the pain and to save face. Politically, we can shift the blame towards the ‘others.’ Either directly or indirectly, we point the finger at brown people coming over the border, it’s those homosexuals, it’s in our tolerance of abortion, which brings ‘God’s Wrath’ to rain down upon our country. Really? Is that why we suffer? As I’ve heard in sermon after sermon, the not-so-faithful suffer for a myriad of different reasons which can be broadly summarized in not being faithful enough to God (i.e. what the church teaches about what God wants from us.) The church has built a system for explaining the suffering of those who support the church; either it blames the external wicked, satanic culture, the victim of abuse, or God Himself. The system of authoritarian hierarchy itself helps make this possible. The evangelical church will not examine itself—it’s descent into depravity is too far along.

I’ll say it again, I don’t (that is, no longer) believe God is an asshole. As well-meaning as it all well may be to the naive, evangelical teaching makes God out to be an asshole. Pure and simple. All the teaching about joy, suffering, and forgiveness masks and defers confronting the actual human evils, including what the ‘righteous’ teach and do themselves, which lead to suffering. How could the behavior of homosexuals whom you’ve never met have any relation to your suffering? Evangelicals do this because it’s easy. How many times have we heard high profile evangelical teachers talking about hurricanes, earthquakes, terrorist attacks, economic downturns, and even declining SAT scores as God’s curse upon us for tolerating things like abortion and homosexuality? Hundreds? Thousands? For another example, the ‘Focus on the Family,’ purity culture teaching additionally places the fate of the nation upon the ‘purity’ of adolescent female bodies. I grieve this because I know people who have gravely hurt by this lie. I’ve forwarded this stuff personally because I honestly believed that is what good men do. I’m so ashamed I didn’t see through this sooner. People in the church have been shocked to hear that I would now speak against the beloved, ‘godly’ wisdom of Dr. James Dobson. (I was raised on the teachings of that man. Dobson worked under the eugenicist Paul Popenoe. Yep. Dobson just did a better job camouflaging the ‘fact’ that we need more submissive, properly ordered women to pump out more white babies.)  How can such a powerful, hence blessed, and beloved ‘Christian’ industry be wrong about something so obvious and fundamental? Because we’ve been taught Dobson’s advice is ‘biblical’ and the evangelical culture enforces this belief. I remain the heretic for believing the ‘Focus on the Family’ stuff to be oppressive and evil. I cannot undo what I’ve done in parroting that shit. I can only try to change for the future.

(Did you know Russian conservative social scientists, not the religious leaders, adopted Dobson’s rhetoric as a means of convincing Russian [white] women [who had been taking advantage of newfound freedoms] that it was their obligation to be submissive baby factories? The Handmaid’s Tale is not that far off the reality of the length these people would go to ‘save’ us.)

Looking at the specks in every else’s eye, somebody must take the blame for our ‘decline;’ besides LGBTQ people and abortions, why not place the burden upon the weakness of teen girls to fend off the ‘Wild at Heart’ boys as well? We do and believe it’s biblical to maintain old ideas where women in general had little to no standing or rights. As I’ve heard in sermon after sermon, from one parishioner after another, we divert the causes of our suffering upon ethereal notions of ‘God’s Wrath’ upon the toleration of the ‘other’s sin;’ the blame descends even upon your own young women. The fact that you all believe God punishes the nation because you all do not adequately thump on (punish and shame) the vulnerable tells me you all believe God is an asshole. I’m guilty too.

Has there been much talk from within the church about its own toleration of spiritual and sexual abuse, its active coverups of those crimes to maintain appearances, its toleration of lies in its pursuit of power? Not much that I’ve seen. Check out Wartburgwatch.com, the corruption in the church is massive. Those who do dare to question are ostracized as the problem. In addition to fostering a stable of largely silenced victims for sexual exploitation, the evangelical church is also completely submerged in a sea of lies to conceal its supremacist roots by gaslighting all attempts at revealing systemic racism. The church has concocted a theology of appearances. Its leaders either spout lies and hatred of the ‘others’ like Greg Locke and the like, or in milquetoast fashion, act as if there is nothing wrong.

People like Greg Locke are just plain assholes. People who follow leaders like Greg Locke are honest and bold enough to be the open and honest assholes they are. Bravo. Thank you for at least being open about it. Where it gets hazy is trying to determine if those pastors who pretend that there is nothing seriously wrong in the church by just continuing ‘business as usual’ are active concealers of the problem (a form of the word-of-the-year gaslighting,) or are truly innocent of the fact that the church has institutionalized systematic abuse and the obfuscation of the truth. It’s hard to tell. I was fooled for decades. Damn I feel stupid. Do I give those pastors who act like there is nothing wrong a break? After all, we are all subject to ‘truth’ formed through hundreds of years of conditioning to protect the institution itself, its power structures, and money flow. Let’s dig a little into the practical affect common Christian teaching and/or aphorisms has upon the psyches, beliefs, and practices among the faithful.

Forgiveness is a Christian absolute. In a recent sermon about the ‘Lordship of Christ,’ absolute obedience to that Lordship, substitute the church in as Christ’s surrogate, is imperative. Since Jesus Himself is not standing in front of us, the church practically acts as the authority. There is no practical way out of this since the church functions as an authoritarian structure which assumes to speak for Christ. Evil men and women, looking to make a buck, looking to molest and subjugate, are offered a culture in which the victims are endlessly admonished by ‘God’ to forgive whatever abuse they suffer. And if they don’t, heaven forbid, they will not be forgiven themselves. How often will it be their fault, an offense against ‘God,’ if they should sully the image of church should they reveal and/or confront the abuse openly? Very often. The abused are called to abide, forgive, and give 10% of their income to the ‘Lordship of Christ’ to keep supporting the institution of abuse.

Various coping mechanisms must be developed to maintain the facade. I recently heard a heartbreaking ‘testimony’ which revealed a long list of hurt and betrayals, being lied to, but that it ultimately led to the blessing of being where they are now. (As if they won’t get fucked again where they are now.) In evangelical theology, ‘everything happens for a reason.’ This puts God on the hook; again, God is an asshole. All the hurts dealt by the church, and all the hurts delivered by the ‘holier-than-thou’ men are given by God for the ultimate benefit of those so abused. Delicious, isn’t it? This institutional cannibalism will not change until it is seriously challenged.

Moreover, evangelicals teach that the experience of joy is not circumstantial. Again, how convenient for those in the power structure to abuse those under their charge? This mechanism is akin to and bolstered by the massive ‘health and wealth’ industry which supposes if you are not personally healthy and wealthy then your ‘faith’ must be lacking—there is something wrong with you and your relationship with God. It poisons everything. Likewise, the faithful are expected to feel joy, which is supposedly non-circumstantial and is a ‘fruit of the spirit’ (Galatians 5:22,) no matter what they may be experiencing. If you don’t feel ‘joy,’ there is something wrong with you and your relationship with God. Thus, the well-meaning appeal to joy acts as a command to feel joy no matter what. This acts as a mechanism to suppress confronting real evils and abuse within the church. And so, abuse flourishes and is protected.

In ejecting evangelical theology, I’ve never been happier.  I no longer, honestly, believe God is an asshole. All the man-made inventions which turned Him into one are falling away. The dysfunctional appeals to joy under the uncertainty of being in ‘right relationship’ with God have given way to relaxation and acceptance of my uncertain state in the universe. The evangelical formula for salvation doesn’t make any biblical sense anyway. Such a formulation, typified in the sinner’s prayer, is self-centered as it serves as a protective spell against the threat of eternal conscious torment. Hence, faith de-centers. If I face oblivion, so be it. Although there will be no me to be thankful then (whenever and whatever then is,) I will be thankful now for my life now. I simply do not believe the church’s threat of eternal conscious torment to obey its dictates to hence endure its abusive teaching on everything else.

Forgiveness is not something to be demanded. Forgiveness is not absolute. Those evangelicals who would argue with me on this point, I would point to the evangelical doctrine of eternal conscious torment—God doesn’t forgive them (and perhaps me) to painfully suffer His hatred forever for offending Him. God thus forever becomes the vindictive victim.

Forgiveness is much more dynamic than that. With evangelical teaching as forgiveness becoming an absolute, the onus for ‘fixing’ a separation of relationship due to an offense lies upon the victim. I agree that I cannot ‘work’ my way to heaven—no argument there. Such an approach to works would be self-centered anyway. I’ve done things to hurt people, I’m sorry, but it is done and there is nothing I can do to change that. There is no formula to ‘fix’ any wrong which has already been done. That is the law of action in the flow of time. So, in an absolute sense there is no absolution. My offenses may be forgiven but I have no right to demand that they be. If the faithful are, in effect, commanded to forgive unconditionally then the predators, the abusers, those who do not count the little people as being fully human worthy of equal consideration, are given the freedom to act without a check upon their abuses. This is fundamentally evil and is the environment evangelicalism currently offers.

A healthier, more balanced approach to forgiveness is that if one is truly penitent, he or she would not appeal to the supposed universal demand for forgiveness to be let off the hook. The offender would, in a better world, desire to alleviate the suffering of the person offended but would not want to add to that suffering with any demands for forgiveness or even the acceptance of their own presence if that should add to the hurt. Expressing sorrow could be cathartic to the victim but if such sorrow is indeed taken to be genuine it must be given and accepted in an atmosphere of freedom. The command to offer absolute forgiveness under threat destroys the environment of freedom so that true healing can occur. Force, fear, and threat destroy love. Yet the evangelical views the call to absolute forgiveness to be the very essence of expressed love; in this we have a major disagreement.

If the penitent one is truly sorry, in the circumstances of victim’s refusal to acknowledge the offender’s apology, the penitent’s obligations regardless of acceptance ought to shift towards the whole human race to do the work required to not offend/hurt others in the future. That is all we can do. This better leads to equality amongst humans who harm each other. Peace can only come through equality and equal recognition, else there is only subjugation, submission, and oppression. Forgiveness then can be freely given, without coercion, as there would be no force of threat to punishment by the ultimate authority in the universe if one should fail to yield to their supposed obligation. Abusers would no longer have the freedom to do as they do and be let off the hook; it would be their choice to yield to the dignity and humanity of others—or to not.

Likewise, with the typical evangelical teaching to experience joy as a fruit of the spirit, the faithful adherence to command to joy is not free to experience the full range of human emotions which naturally come in response to care, solidarity, or abuse. As it stands now, citing case after case, the victims of those higher up the chain of authority are commanded to feel joy no matter what is being done to them. This is sick and alienating. Did your pastor, husband, father, mother do something awful to you? Why can’t you be more forgiving? I’ve heard this time, after time, after time. The parishioners themselves will tear into and shame into submission anyone who would dare make an accusation against a beloved holy figure. It happens all the time. In evangelical thought as practically applied, forgiveness functions within, and according to, the chain of hierarchy. As a personal example, the one who hurt me the most is higher up the chain of authority and has made it abundantly clear that she has no obligation to acknowledge the ways in which she gravely hurt me and my children. On the contrary, the command to forgiveness has been weaponized against me, under threat of eternal damnation by God Himself, that I should bend the knee to beg her forgiveness for not meeting my obligations as a son—to endure ongoing belittlement and shaming which in her twisted mind would lead to my betterment (and salvation) if would just submit. For decades I lived under this threat, of not submitting adequately to God’s command, as it served as a platform for decades of abuse. Brainwashed, I honestly thought that God was an asshole who required that I forgive whatever abuses I suffered through the words and actions of mom. I’ve now lived 5 free years away from her by rejecting that fucked up evangelical teaching. This is yet another reason why I’ve never been happier.

The universal and absolute call to joy and forgiveness says little, if nothing, of alleviating suffering. Rather, the teaching serves up a fatalistic command to accept suffering and be happy about it. Your kid has cancer? It’s not really a tragedy, it is ultimately a gift from God for everyone’s benefit. Again, God is implicated as an asshole which then must be covered for. Steven Pinker wrote a book, Better Angels of our Nature, which compiles hundreds of years of data to dispel the myth of the ‘good ol’ days.’ He makes abundant case that despite whatever FoxNews says about crime and the ever-present ‘Crisis at the Border!’ things are progressively (an evil word, I know) getting more healthy, prosperous, and far less violent. (No thanks to the right-wing assholes openly calling for the violent overthrow of our government with no shame or fear of reprisal from the electorate.) The primary reason given for this significant advancement is the better treatment of children. Because children are named, cared for, and educated, and the ‘godly’ doctrine of beating the shit out of your kids because they are pissing you off (sanctify it all you want, but this is how it often practiced—as it was with me) are being increasing rejected, subsequent generations are becoming kinder, more accepting of difference, and are less violent. This is making a better world.

What makes a better world is not the acceptance of suffering, but the active quest to eliminate it. Kindness tends to beget kindness. Cruelty tends to beget cruelty, reprisal, or cowardice. The acceptance of suffering leads us to believe those less fortunate than us likely ought to remain in that condition for their own betterment—perhaps serving as an incentive for them to reach out to God. We would not have to then consider our role in the actual physical betterment of their situation lest we interfere with their spiritual development according to God’s will. This is where this teaching can and does lead towards the belief in (white Christian) supremacy. If we were to take the teaching of suffering leading to our betterment to its logical end, then indeed ‘that which does not kill me only makes me stronger.’  A cruel world would remain where only the strongest survive in a violent world of desperate scarcity as it has been for thousands of years. All the work of scientists, doctors, and engineers to grow more food, to produce more energy to fuel technological advancement, to develop vaccines, medicine, surgical techniques, and diagnostic machines would be stifled by the notion that God intends us to joyfully suffer for own betterment. We live in such a world where even the most ardent fundamentalist must cherry-pick the scriptures to deal with the dissonance created by our collective prosperity created by people trying to make a better world.

The cherry-picking to support the sorting process continues as unreflective evangelical teachers parrot the party line concerning joy and suffering. To end on a positive note, I believe it would be better to regard James’ (if it was indeed James, the brother of Jesus) teaching within its original context—advice to a community that did not have the social power to better its situation. That teaching is fatalistic and if taken as an absolute would leave little incentive to work towards making a better world for everyone. I’ll repeat, EVERYONE. Do not teach people to accept suffering. Teach them to work to overcome it. Teach people that it is okay, normal, rational, human to experience sadness, anger, indignation, grief in the face of suffering and abuse. Do not teach people to mask themselves lest they be regarded as being less-than-spiritually okay because they do not have joy—a fruit of the spirit. The common teaching concerning joy has led to the church being not only being the most segregated hour of the week but also the most masked. Teach them to seek justice, not some appearance of an emotion to save face.

Teach them that they are not obligated to automatically forgive. ALL PEOPLE, no matter the race, color, sex, preference, relation, ethnicity, abilities, religion, etc. are equal in every way no matter how we see their relation to God. There is no legitimate hierarchy of persons. Teach people to live this. This creates a culture in which justice is sought; appearances are not the concern. (Answer honestly, was Jesus concerned with appearances?) Predators would have a much harder time working their damage in such an environment where every human being was being actively protected regardless of how things may appear. Let everyone feel loved by offering that protection no matter what with no shame of sullying the name of the church should abuse occur and be revealed. Let air get to the wounds. It is about time we stop weaponizing joy and forgiveness.

Amen  

“Without Christ, our hearts are desperately wicked.”

I recently heard a well-meaning pastor proclaim this ‘truth’ in a sermon which brought up two initial questions: Is it true? Is it helpful? In my deconstruction process, there is an extreme temptation to just walk away and save myself from all the toxicity of the evangelical world. Trouble is, I believe there is still such a thing as truth and a God to whom I am accountable for trying to help other human beings. (The eternal question is how best to do that.) The bondage to which the evangelical is bound is insidious and mostly unseen. The culture, the language we use is so deep and ingrained that most evangelicals do not see the trap within an engineered view of reality designed to satisfy our desires for comfort and connection. All we must do is feed the machine in exchange for that comfort. For most, the outside world is too painful and scary to risk asking dangerous questions. Our ‘leadership,’ in large part, promotes resentment, stories of Christian persecution against furtive lies of inherent superiority, and fear of the ‘others’ keep us in our proper place in the hierarchy. I cite as evidence sociological studies (The Flag and the Cross, cited below, is recent source of data) which graph our various beliefs. Most evangelicals honestly believe they are being picked on in this country. What is closer to reality is that the evangelical leadership preys upon their flocks. As has been repeated in history time and again, if we believe there is someone under us socially, we’ll stay in line. If hierarchal order is maintained, we are happy. Statements like ‘Without Christ…’ comforts Christians and support their sense of superiority who are persecuted for being such. This is not helpful to the commission.

‘But be doers of the word, and not hearers only, deceiving ourselves.’ James 1:22

There are innumerable combinations of The Word. These variations promise ‘freedom’ in exchange for submission, and the precepts of the faction are fearfully defended as being utterly clear (despite our natural angst) to those loyal to that faction. Righteousness thus equals loyalty to your own faction and its precepts. The question which arises in my mind amid all the conflict and contradiction between all the things men say God wants, all claiming they are ‘biblical,’ is ‘is it really God’s will that we all be broke up into factions?’ Is this the way to save the ‘lost’ by demanding they become like us so that God’s wrath be stayed against them? The pastor’s statement creates factions—us and them.

There is no verse in the Bible which directly states, ‘without Christ, our hearts are desperately wicked.’ The pastor is extrapolating this from various passages concerning wicked hearts and deliverance from evil being made possible through Christ. Sounds fair enough, right? The faithful who’ve heard this kind of teaching time after time most of the time don’t think much into it. Except that in its utter simplicity, its ‘clearness’ as that asshat Tim would put it, such a statement, if one think deeper on the implications, provides the words to cast a comforting illusion—that those who ‘have Christ’ are intrinsically moral and thus ought to be calling the shots for everyone else since ‘the others’ are intrinsically wicked. This is what the voting patterns, the flow of money, and activism show. ‘Righteous’ laws, that is, laws based upon common perceptions of what is ‘biblical’ are arising all over the country. It is very clear that our Constitution has no basis in biblical law (see Seidel, Andrew L. The Founding Myth: Why Christian Nationalism is Un-American) yet Christians, who believe they are the ones being persecuted, are using their hard-won political power to enact and enforce religiously based laws upon everyone despite what their religious beliefs may be. (Freedom for me but not for thee.) This is tyranny which gravely hurts (and even kills) people. This encroachment upon freedom alienates and pisses people off. There is nothing patriotic about Christian Nationalism.

The illusions of moral superiority are comforting and useful but there are a whole host of consequences which arise out of casting these spells. I’m going to write here about some of these consequences which are embedded in our history. The Bible does talk about creating illusions to comfort ourselves (Isaiah 30: 9-11; 2 Timothy 4:3.) As I’m going to argue, casting illusions often leads to obvious evil. Let’s go back in time to list just a few examples out of thousands (which the Christian cabal is doing their best to scrub out of the public mind though force of law and intimidation. Nothing new.)

Good ‘ole John Calvin (I’ve read his Institutes,) once he established his little holy dictatorship in Geneva burned Michael Servetus to death for heresy. (Yeah, there was a ‘governing council’ but it is clear who was calling the shots.) Beware of letting even ‘the righteous’ centralize power—they’ll kill you in the name of God. Later, in the good ‘ole Puritan days, some years before the Mathers were dispensing blatantly racist ‘wisdom’ and ‘visions’ were admissible as evidence in court at the witch trials, Captain John Underhill organized a genocide against the Pequot people in 1637. The violence was vicious and indiscriminate. The totality of the destruction was justified by Underhill who said, “sometimes the Scripture declareth women and children must perish with their parents […] We had sufficient light from the Word of God for our proceedings.”

Wise, Steven M. (2009). An American Trilogy: Death, Slavery, and Dominion on the Banks of the Cape Fear River. UK: Hachette. p. 33. ISBN9780786745395.

After all, Joshua had been oft given the mandate to kill everything in the way of the ‘chosen’ people. The Puritans thought of themselves as chosen. This manner of thought, that Christ was with the righteous ‘chosen,’ as passed down from generation to generation, fed a generalized belief in white supremacy as Christianity was the dominate religion of the whites. (Some theological wrangling had to be figured when both natives and black slaves started to convert.) The affirmation that all hearts are wicked without Christ can be seen as a blank check to justify many things including white rule over ‘the wicked.’ And it often was. This common mindset, along with a host of crimes committed against human beings, led to the white Christian nationalism we have today. As Philip S. Gorski and Samuel L Perry puts it,

White Christian nationalism designates who is ‘worthy’ of the freedom it cherishes, namely, ‘people like us.’ But for the ‘others’ outside that group, white Christian nationalism grants whites in authority the ‘freedom’ to control such populations, to maintain a certain kind of social order that privileges ‘good people like us’ through violence if necessary.”

Gorski, Philip S. and Perry, Samuel L. (2022). The Flag and the Cross: White Christian Nationalism and the Threat to American Democracy. P. 96

But not all ‘Christians,’ either then or today agree with the imperative that the (self-assigned) righteous ought to rule over those the righteous have labeled as ‘wicked.’ People can make ‘biblical’ arguments that God endorses slavery, or abolition, or equality, or patriarchy; that God loves all (Romans 2:11, Acts 10:34, Galatians 3:28, Ephesians 6:9) impartially, or in Jonathan Edward’s view that an angry God is holding the sinner (who, according to the TULIP doctrine, has no real choice in the matter) as a ‘loathsome spider over the flames.’ It seems that even back in the Puritan days, there were Christians who did differ (as I do) with the blanket statement that ‘without Christ, the heart is desperately wicked’ and were forced out of the righteous community for holding disparate beliefs concerning freedom of conscience (and by extension, the full humanity of all.) I’ll list an example…

Roger Williams (1603-1683) was once part of the Puritan community who was exiled (thankfully Calvin wasn’t in charge) for sedition and heresy to later found the First Baptist Church in Rhode Island. Gorski and Perry summarize the essential differences thusly,   

William’s views differed from Mather’s in at least three key respects: First, he drew a sharp line between Christianity and morality: the one did not imply the other. In his observation, the morality of the natives was often superior to that of the Puritans. Second, he drew a sharp line between religious and civil authority, much sharper even than the Puritans, not because he worried about the church corrupting the state but rather the reverse. Third, because he believed that freedom of conscience was absolute, and that it implied freedom of expression. He rejected the collective authority of the Puritan clergy and, even more, their efforts to silence dissent. In sum, Williams believed that people of the most varied backgrounds could still form a civil society together, so long as they separated religion and morality and church and state and did not force anyone’s conscience or silence anyone’s speech. This he called ‘meer civility.’ Sadly, the path of ‘meer civility’ was the road less traveled in William’s day. Killing and converting would become the dominant poles of ‘Indian policy’ in the centuries that followed.”

Gorski, Philip S. and Perry, Samuel L. (2022). The Flag and the Cross: White Christian Nationalism and the Threat to American Democracy. P. 52

Although there were exceptions, our collective ethic justified actions which led to the mass acceptance of theft, lies, murder, enslavement, terror campaigns (lynching,) racist laws, incarceration, economic policies, and cultural exclusion in order to keep those not deemed as ‘one of us’ in their place. This continues to this day. We seem to be completely comfortable with forcing people’s consciences through the force of law—for the greater good. We are completely comfortable silencing people’s speech as we continue to enact laws to silence those we regard as being unrighteous. ‘Don’t say gay.’ Our anger and fear of the ‘others’ is constantly being reinforced. Just turn on FoxNews and the chances are good that the captions flashing across the bottom of the screen will say ‘Crisis at the Border!’ (I don’t intentionally watch FoxNews but it’s constantly blaring at the gym.) Tucker Carlson regularly vomits lies about ‘Great Replacement’ theory. (That bunch is just chasing money—fostering fear and anger brings in tons of it.) The whole system is infused with Q fueled lies and insanity, all worshiping at the altar of Trump.

With the victory of Trump, Republicans, to whom conservative Christians remain fiercely loyal as the force which will return America to God, do not even have to be that furtive in their racism and xenophobia anymore. (Articles in this blog have listed numerous examples.) Any government money that doesn’t flow to them (or their heroes) is ‘socialism.’ The latest involves student loan forgiveness. Numerous Republican talking heads are screaming about this when many of them have enjoyed PPP loan forgiveness in amounts far larger than what Biden is offering. The dirty truth is that Biden’s loan forgiveness does not forgive the ‘right’ people. This is right up there with too many of the ‘wrong’ (since outright, direct exclusion was no longer openly acceptable) people were getting a subsidized college education, so the Christian Right through Ronald Reagan started making college a whole lot more expensive (30% increase in one year!) Of course, the result of increasing prices, poorer people were going to have to take out loans to go to college. But through the righteous messaging machine, the debt is their fault since all fault is individual rather than systemic. This provides an easy moral out for those who pull the strings of power in favor of their own. Anne Nelson’s Shadow Network: Media, Money, and the Secret Hub of the Radical Right plainly lays out the flow of money through various players to create the righteous new order of doing business.   

The Christian Right didn’t get organized as a force until the Federal government started coming after the tax-exempt status of segregation academies which arose after Brown vs. the Board of Education. (Jerry Falwell had one, Liberty University.) Protestants didn’t give a rip about abortion back then—that was a Catholic issue. What is really at issue is the division of power and money. The Republicans, as they are all now cozied up with the Christian Right (the process of infiltration described in Anne Nelson’s book Shadow Network,) are very good at messaging having massive networks, including FoxNews and Salem Communications, to spread their bullshit under the patriotic guise of fighting ‘socialism’ (and promoting ‘family values.’) ‘Socialism’ is fine with the righteous if the money flows to the ‘right’ people. The ‘biblical’ concept of Jubilee only applies to certain people in our ‘capitalist’ (snicker) society. Corporate welfare is A-OK. The Koch’s can freely fuck us all. Societal success is determined by the number of billionaires we can make even richer. There seems to be a collective need for an underclass even when the middle-class, the one’s being taught to wish for all this fuckery, are getting fucked as well. (Here is an analysis of the forgiveness program.)

Beyond all the money flowing from here to there and back (up to the controllers) again, the fact remains that due to declining numbers of white people, those who’ve historically been dominant, the electoral advantages must be further amplified. They’ve learned from January 6th; those mistakes will likely not be repeated. Now that SCOTUS is 6-3, the Right’s program to overcome the numerical disadvantage marches on. Moore vs. Harper is set to be heard this fall. The Trump machine is trying to place ‘Big Lie’ endorsing candidates in numerous Secretary of State positions around the country. It is truly scary to see their success. As I’ve repeatedly made the point, Christians do not care about piety as they’ve made clear in endorsing, and voting for, the worst human being who has ever been in that office. As I’ve said before, Trump will burn the world to the ground to be king of it. I continue to stand on that statement. What the average Trump voter wants is the (perception of) power to maintain their (perception of) dominance, as promised to them by a liar. What is closer to the truth is that we are all being played into endorsing an encroaching fascist oligarchy. Revolving around this whole shit show is a myriad of sycophants who will say and do anything to grasp at any scraps of power which may remain. What is certain is that Trump is too much of a lazy moron to make this fascistic dream happen; the question remains in how to transfer the movement, the namesake, the power, and the revenue generation capability to someone more competent (like Ron DeSantis) without pissing off all the rabid, clown-show Q idiots financing the whole mess. There is precious few in the clergy who are speaking out about the blatant immorality of all this. They dare not if they want to keep their jobs. Those who have spoken out are often exiled. Familiar story? (Look over there! There be some homosexuals and transgender folk—all our problems are their fault, let’s get ‘em!)

Beyond the political use of the statement ‘without Christ, the heart is desperately wicked,’ there is a serious affect upon the church’s witness to the ‘lost.’ The belief in divinely bestowed special preference can set up a certain arrogance within the heart of the believer; and this is not lost to the observing non-believer. I’ve seen this quite clearly as expressed in the doctrine of entire sanctification, which I always thought was bullshit, and with the Pentecostals in their doctrine of the Second Baptism of the Holy Spirit which I thought was bullshit as well. I’ve seen tears shed over this. Seriously. There has so much pain and uncertainty over whether one is truly saved, loved enough, to the degree required to make the cut for the rapture and so be spared the terrors of the anti-Christ and the bowls of God’s Wrath. I was raised in the context of this terror. I can’t tell you how many times I thought, ‘fuck, I missed it,’ when someone I expected wasn’t where I thought they would be. It’s terror, pure and simple (and is an especially shitty fear to place upon kids in order to ‘save’ their souls.)

I fail to see how a God, who on one hand is described as the very definition of Love, can hold the sinner over the flames as one would hold a loathsome spider. In Philippians 2, Paul talks of Jesus forfeiting His divine right to condescend to us—to save us. Jesus claimed to His disciples that if they’ve seen Him they’ve seen the Father. Could not then the Father forfeit His divine right to use his almighty power to send all the sinners to endure eternal conscious torment in the flames because they offended an eternal Being? As many, many Christians believe, if you’ve never heard of the salvific power in Jesus then it really sucks to be you—you are eternally burned by accident of birth. Is this love?

It’s possible that I may be facing such a fate; I hope not. But I think this is highly unlikely since I don’t believe God is an asshole. The very notion of eternal conscious torment offends the idea of true love. Many may bristle at the thought of the likes of Hitler getting away with it. We want justice; but the kind of justice we want is relative, isn’t it? (Mercy for me but not for thee?) What is justice? Philosophers have been wrestling with this for thousands of years. I think what is closer to the truth is that we all are going to ‘get away with it’ in one way or another. Rob Bell has his ideas; I have mine. I doubt people like Hitler or Trump would want to share space with God; so, I think they will be consigned to oblivion. In my view, their sins were nailed to that cross as well. The matter comes down to where we want to reside—God forfeits His divine rights to punish our sin in His love. It’s the only chance we have—His undying, unmerited love. This is what I want to believe. There is our justice, like it or not—accept the gift that benefits you as well. How this propitiation works is beyond me or anyone else to understand. I’m willing (and wanting) to accept this despite all the rotten things done to me in exchange for the forgiveness of all the rotten things I’ve done to others. This requires letting go of justice in the future world. A hard thing to do as it makes a lot of moral grey to contend with as we negotiate and weigh various moral claims to defend ourselves and others against all the liars and predators in the world.

As it seems obvious, we could not be as we are now in the heavenly realms, so too it seems we could not be as we are now in what we call Hell. As Lewis argued, the threat of hell should not be our motivator—else hell be given power that does not belong to it. The threat of hell is fear based. St. John argued that love drives out fear. Yet, fear is what drives our evangelism, our politics, and our need to create divisions between us. Just because one claims to be Christian does not mean that one is a good person (Luke 13: 22-30.) Jesus, Paul, John, Peter, James, Calvin, Luther, and many, many others have said a great number of things about the nature of salvific faith to which numerous ideas, practices, and affirmations have arisen in response. James talked about the necessity of doing (good.) Jesus seemed to focus on the state of the heart (desire.) Paul, seemingly contra James 2, implied in his letter to the Galatians (2:26) that salvation is not by works but through faith in Jesus Christ. What gives?

I’ve made it clear that I don’t embrace the doctrine of inerrancy. (I still believe in the testimony of suffering so my belief in the resurrection remains.) ‘Christian’ values have evolved tremendously over the millennia as Christians have morphed their understanding of scripture for sake of palatability. I’m doing the same. One of the rising humanist values which challenges the fundamentalist patriarchal lens for interpreting the Bible is equality. This is very threatening to the established order—today’s Christian has been conditioned to believe that order is a primary value which must be maintained. The reason I bristle so intently at the teaching that ‘without Christ, the heart is desperately wicked’ is that it gives license to the average Christian to not examine the motives and fruit of their leadership—they are free to just assume that the leadership is being led by the spirit of Christ sparing them to look at all the abundant depravity in the Christian endorsed political activities and process. The faithful can just tune in to the content that Salem Communications provides, attend a service which provide positive affirmations and then comfortably rest assured that God is in charge. Personal responsibility to dig is absolved. Just keep voting Republican and God will handle the rest to affirm ‘family values.’ Easy Peasy.

Jesus talked about good trees producing good fruit. Bad fruit tells a different story. In all the things I talked about above, the evil which comes from believing ‘some are more equal than others,’ and that the ‘righteous’ ought to rule the ‘wicked’ no matter what dishonesty and cheating the system is engaged in, and that we must support the system to ‘make America great again,’ all these listed above are rotten fruit born from a rotten tree. Those you call wicked see this; they see the fear, the dishonesty, the ever angry, hateful authoritarian God, and clearly receive the blatant message that Christians think of themselves as being better than everyone else. In agreeing with ‘them’ I’ve become wicked, and a threat, as well. Christians have pushed out the human context for exampling the love of God. By what the church does, in its devotion to the tenets of Christian nationalism as based in white supremacy, Christians tell the world that they are keepers and dispensers of God’s love. The righteous shall dispense ‘love’ as the righteous see fit. The so-called ‘wicked,’ being also made in the image of God, do not see such an authoritarian program as righteous at all since they’ve not been blinded by the affirmation of the blank check. (That is, the assurance that one is righteous because one claims the Spirit of Christ.) In this Christians have lost their claim (to righteousness.) The whole matter has devolved into competition between one authority and another; one that claims divine sanction via ‘scripture’ and ‘revelation’ and the other which asserts the equal value of every human being. General revelation vs Special revelation. Love is lost in the fog of deception and perception.

It’s right there, in our politics and in our words as the Christian political juggernaut is running the country, and the world, right into the ground. Using the rhetorical device of apophasis, the Right is calling for (further) violence in the streets (if they don’t get what they want) while providing plausible deniability that it didn’t approve of said violence should it happen. The double standard is alive and well. The Black Lives Matter violence after the blatant murder of George Floyd (and many, many other murders and abuses perpetrated against our underclass, openly spurred on by our dear leader) was an affront to everything holy and decent while the violence of the ‘patriots’ who stormed the Capitol on January 6th in an attempt to overthrow the election for their messiah, causing much death, injury, and PTSD to the Law Enforcement officers who stood their ground as POTUS urged the mob on, was acceptable, even valiant, patriotism. Our country is in serious trouble as around half of us, Democrat, Independent, and Republican, believe civil war is in our near future.

This is terrifying. What the Christians are saying to their ‘lost’ neighbors is ‘submit to us or be crushed.’ Where is the love in that? Yet, ‘God is doing mighty things in our church.’ Screw the rest; it is either willful ignorance or a deliberate choice to maintain an illusion. It may be selfishness; it may be cowardice. ‘Without Christ, the heart is desperately wicked’ maintains the illusion of Christian supremacy. I choose to believe we all have good and bad in us to varying degrees. (Though I must admit that I still fail to see anything good in Donald Trump.) I am much more inclined to trust someone who puts the illusion of righteousness aside to embrace me (the rebel) and everyone else as initially having the benefit of the doubt as being equally worthy of love and respect until their actions should show them to be malicious. And even then, there may be hope until they’ve made it clear that either want to rule it all, burn it all down, lie, rape, murder, cheat, steal or all the above. In that case, I believe it is our duty to defend others against these malicious beings. It seems a line must be drawn somewhere.

We are all God’s children. Equally loved. You pull the ‘holy,’ elitist, separatist thing with me, and I’ll likely regard you as being either a con and a predator or a fool. (I admit that I was fooled for decades.) Such creatures make poor witnesses to what is merciful, good, and true. Being LGBTQ+ does not make anyone evil or a threat. Having an abortion doesn’t make someone a murderer responsible for hurricanes and earthquakes. Losing your virginity (a nebulous concept anyway) does not make you any less valuable as a person. But these are some of the black and white teachings of the evangelical world which cause so much suffering and leads to great predation and evil. I cannot in good conscience agree with you even if you say I risk the fires of hell. (Oblivion is more likely.) The authoritarian, patriarchal teachings of those ‘in Christ’ set the stage for horrifying abuses at the hands of those higher up the evangelical food chain. It is clear, many, many people who claim the authority of Christ, as they have the ‘Spirit of Christ,’ are obviously wicked people because they prey upon those they’ve intentionally taught to be weak and undiscerning. These authorities use their ‘God-given’ authority to prey upon others. Therefore, I react strongly against those who teach these destructive things. (I used to barf out this stuff as well. It is not easy to admit I was wrong.) The way forward is scary and is anything but clear.

But the fact remains that in the process of jettisoning all the toxicity of evangelical teaching I’ve never been happier. The moral world is grey with many different factors which figure into a seemingly endless fractious moral equation. The common denominator is the value of each human being regardless of where they come from, who their parents were, who they are attracted to, or what they believe about God or anything else. There is something key about content of character…

All the examples I listed above show that evangelical Christian has no right to claim they are morally superior to anybody. As for me, I think the evangelical church is highly immoral. Yes, there are good people within that body. But they don’t dominate the agenda. They obey.

Men who understand the times

‘Of Issachar, men who had understanding of the times, to know what Israel ought to do, 200 chiefs, and all their kinsmen under their command.’ 1 Chronicles 12:32 

This verse commonly serves as an anchor for Father’s Day sermons. Will you be this kind of man? Stand up now. Between (56:30-58:20) Tim implores the ‘men of Issachar’ to stand up. What is the understanding of these times? From what context is Tim asking the men to stand? At 53:30 he says that we should have the courage to stand alone. Just who exactly is standing alone?

To establish some context, Tim quotes from a verse I used in a recent post

“You shall not spread a false report. You shall not join hands with a wicked man to be a malicious witness. You shall not fall in with the many to do evil, nor shall you bear witness in a lawsuit, siding with the many, so as to pervert justice.” Exodus 23: 1-2

But then to a very different purpose, and from a different understanding than what I intended. Who are the many, and to what evil are ‘the many’ standing in support of? In what way is justice being perverted? As an example, Tim references Rick Warren’s 2013 stand against gay marriage. In response to Piers Morgan’s pressure, Warren said, ‘I fear the disapproval of God more than society’s disapproval.’ 56:00 Fair enough. The question I have is whether God approves of both our tactics and strategy in combating those things we see as evil in the world.

In that interview, Warren is expressing his religious view that marriage should not be redefined to allow gay people to marry. This is protected speech under the First Amendment. However, as I’ve listed example after example, the Christian Right now seeks to use political force, which has been radicalized and encouraged by all the power it has gained under Trump, to impose its will upon the rest of society—be they Christian or not. This is not okay. Warren’s assumption implies that he believes the nation is a Christian one—this is what he was fighting for. If Christians believed in democracy, rule by the people, we would submit to majority rule as the law of the land. Of course, there are exemptions to following the rule of the land, like standing against genocide and the oppression of a people group (as in Nazi Germany for example,) which could serve as a model. But what really are we standing against? Are the gays systematically killing and oppressing people? Their choice to marry doesn’t hurt anyone—literally. What we are talking about here is essentially about hurt feelings over imagined oppression and the fear that God will unleash His terrifying wrath, according to what we have been told by mere men. The Bible is the authority, I understand. But men cherry-pick the Bible to suit their own purposes. The Christian Right is claiming to rule everyone Deus Vult—over hurt feelings and fear for our own wellbeing. The sins of the LGBTQ community have risen to the level of genocide through the means of the annihilation of the family—so we’ve been effectively told. In this Christian mind, this is what it is.

The righteous divine mandate stated is that homosexual sin hurts the homosexuals themselves. Does it? What about the feelings which are intrinsic to the person who just doesn’t fit into the expectations? They are being essentially told that God hates them because of what they feel. And what if they don’t believe in God? What about the damage inflicted upon the ‘sinner’ by the righteous who are supposedly working to impose God’s mercy on the condition of suppression and submission? Religiosity aside, this righteous indignation is based upon a simple rejection of the democratic principle of common governance. Instead of loving unjudgementally, as fellow sinners, more and more violence are being used and threatened by adherents to the salvatory Christian Right to gain more power to impose ‘God’s Law’ upon everyone in the United States of America. This is what we’ve become.

Rick Warren’s stand against gay marriage is the context Tim provides to call us to be men of Issachar. With all that is going on, this is Tim’s issue. ‘A line must be drawn in the sand.’ Much has changed Tim, from the time of Warren’s sanguine and toothless interview to now where emboldened ‘Christian’ Patriots are ramping up the threats. A Boise Baptist pastor said the God wants to “put all queers to death. …These people know that they’re worthy of death.” Are these the men of Issachar who understand the times? Are these the ones who are standing up? You may say that you don’t mean for the use and threats of violence to achieve the goals of righteousness, but these are the times. If you mean for the peaceful acquisition of power to ‘Make America Great Again,’ by using the gay marriage issue as the context for calling us to be ‘men of Issachar,’ your lack of specificity allows ‘the times’ to dictate the terms of that calling thus demonstrating that you don’t understand the times. ‘The times’ are becoming more and more militant and violent every day—all to enforce ‘God’s’ righteousness. This is the environment the now politically dominant Christian Right has feed and fostered for decades. As a Christian leader, if you don’t speak against it, you are for it.

The use of Exodus 23:1-2 to bolster your point about standing for righteousness against the masses of worldly sinners ignores the plank in your own eye. The masses of militant Christians who have it in for the evil ‘sodomites’ are falling in line with ‘the many’ of their own brethren to pervert justice by turning a blind eye to the lies and treason of those who empower them to go after those evil LGBTQ people—people whom many of you often say God would relish afflicting great terror and suffering for their wickedness. What gives you the right? Oh yeah… Deus Vult!

Once again, Jesus did not teach us to ‘stand’ in this way to inflict threats and violence. Nor do I believe Jesus would have stand silent and complicit in a culture which now encourages threats and violent to affect ‘righteous’ change. Like a broken record I repeat, our ‘teachers’ have prepped us for war as they’ve taught us to reframe Christ has a conquering warrior who will melt the faces off his enemies with laser beams shooting out of his eyes. We worship our pastors, with all the coverups and abuse, as our dull minds shuffle on having checked the box of having a ‘good service’ thus sanctifying our complicity to lies, treason, and violence.

Just as Hitler feed upon and in turn fueled antisemitism to place Germany’s problems upon the Jews, so too often American Christians blame our problems as a curse from God for our ‘toleration’ of the LGBTQ community. It is the same kind of thing.

Thank God the Coeur d’Alene police stepped up and protected human beings as they should. I don’t see the call to protect the marginalized much from Christians—this leads to the culture of silencing, violence, and persistent threat against those Christians find abominable. What I see from Christians is the cultivated persistent myth that Christians are the ones being picked on. This claim is laughable but man’o man isn’t it comfortable and convenient. It is ‘comfortable and convenient’ because white Christians, as a group, are in fact socially at the top of the heap; and as a result, have no experiential clue as to what real, organized, physically threatening persecution is. Christians deceived themselves into believing this to feel better about themselves as they create the environments which physical threatens those groups they see as posing a threat to their way of life. Tim feeds this mentality when he speaks of ‘standing alone.’ This is an illusion cast by out religious controllers to keep you in constant fear of both ‘the others’ and of the wrath of an inscrutable, eternally angry God. How do you know that war, inflation, drought, or even our ugly divisions which plague our consciences are specifically caused by a curse from God because of, let’s say, the sin of sodomy? Oh yeah… some Adam Henry who claims to talk for God told you so. Got it.

Prove me wrong please; are there many evangelical pastors speaking against Patriot violence against queer people? Tim didn’t; he just listed them as an example of what to stand against. I guess kudos to Tim for not specifically calling for violence, right? Again: if you don’t speak against it, you are for it.

These are ‘the times’ of increasingly violent division. Historically marginalized groups just want to freely live their lives without fear, having their rights as human beings protected by a broad-based, democratically controlled, secular power. To the common Christian fighting the culture war, trained to fear the angry God whose voice of judgement is broadcast by men using mass-media technology, the desire of ‘the others’ to have equal recognition, protection, and human rights is oppression of the Christian faith—because Christians fear ‘God.’ You got it wrong. Your oppression come from your leaders who have punked you into fearing them.

‘This is not a Christian nation.’ This was the heresy I stated just over 5 years ago which earned me my position as an ‘agent of Satan.’ I’m grateful that this self-proclaimed prophet of God woke me up. This was not persecution—this was just trained words from some dumbass who feels powerless who got punked by a bunch of organized people who are using him to forward their own goals. It is highly unfortunate for him, but what he said was a major catalyst leading to my freedom from religious bullshit. I still believe in the Prince of Peace, but the evangelical church is deeply fucked up. This is why there are deep divisions Tim. Jesus’ harsh words were for the religious leaders misleading the people. This is why I speak so harshly to those who claim to have religious authority. My anger stems from the fact that I have been deeply wounded by religious bullshit, which comes from men who want power without question, ever since I was a little kid. As a middle-aged white man with a comfortable pension, I have the power to be free. I want this for everyone.

Again and again, I’ve made arguments which attempt to show the only thing that makes the gospel believable at all is the testimony of suffering. This is what Jesus showed in word and example. One small tragedy on all this mess is that in all the various traumas I’ve experienced in my life, the institutional source, the church, was the most damaging. A typical reason for this trauma which would most likely be stated by the ‘godly’ leadership was my rebellion against the Word of God. I’ve read the Bible too jackasses—many, many times. The church backed the beatings I received from my parents as they weaponized scripture to say that in God’s Law disobedient children deserve to be stoned to death. That’s fucked up. I was shamed and taught fear of God, adult authority figures, and my parents who were His hand. I was silent about being molested by a neighbor only to be shamed later as the Christian reaction to the gay rights movement characterized homosexuals as abominations deserving death. I was terrorized as a little kid about the Tribulation and the anti-Christ—that I wouldn’t make the rapture was a constant fear. I was taught all that Dobsonian nonsense about human sexuality—to be ashamed of natural feelings and desires. I could go on but, to make it short, my formative religious experiences were based in fear and shame. I still struggle with this—but finally I’m getting better as rip myself away from all the training I received from people who just want to be important and in control.

I say all this as a straight, native-born American citizen, white male. I have no way to imagine how things would have been if I were an immigrant, non-white, or homosexual. Christians had me thinking for awhile that I was homosexual even though an eight-year-old boy taught to fear adults and submit to shame had no means to consent to what was done to me. Where is the mercy in that? What made it easier I suppose is that I had no desire for homosexual contact. But what if I had?

A wise black man said, “I’m not saying white people don’t have problems, it’s just that it is more difficult to be like me.” I sometimes imagine how much my religious traumas would have been magnified if I had sexual feelings for the same sex. The guilt is present still in my desires for the opposite sex, but in the Dobsonian universe those feelings are more excusable because they stem from that aggression which is required for leadership. (How convenient.) In any case, nobody is going to scream at, beat, or kill me for those heterosexual desires because they are socially acceptable.

The church is a broken system. It claims that ‘God hates the sin but loves the sinner.’ In practice people conflate the two together—it’s just what we do. We deal with the dissonance by categorizing sin into acceptable and unacceptable columns even going so far as to claim ‘entire sanctification’ thus, by necessity, loading one column heavier than the other. ‘Holy’ people are dangerous and very destructive to others as they load the columns to suit their own perceptions of themselves. They are blind to the fact that we all sin, all the time. Mercy is reserved for themselves. Blame is assigned to the others.

Deep inside we know this is wrong, explaining why we tolerate men telling us that our problems are curses from God because of the sins of ‘the others,’ and our toleration of that sin—all under the deflecting armor of ‘God hates the sin but loves the sinner.’ It’s religious, deflecting, stratifying, bullshit. If the religious leader who may read this believes I have it all wrong, then for fuck sakes don’t just use the cliché’ and then leave to the culture to define it, as I have, as it is commonly practiced; do your job, learn you own culture’s teachings, dig deep, correct it, and teach accordingly. I’m not making a straw man, it’s what we do. I know because I have personally experienced the conflation as explained above.     

Self-reflection is painful. Why do it? It’s far easier to just say it’s ‘the times.’ The pious religious language distances and disembodies the problem. The system encourages this protective mechanism even as it calls us to prayer. I know God hears me, but I have never personally heard a word from Him. I’ve reflected upon this often. Nonetheless, I place my faith in the character of Jesus and in the testimony of suffering. I want to believe that we all have a Father who loves us. I know that Tim said that to truly great one must be the servant of all. This is true. But there seems to be a major disagreement over what being a servant really means. We form up sides, each seeing the other as highly immoral. These are the ‘times.’

So here we are divided. Having lost domination over the overall culture, the Christian warriors settle for a scorched earth campaign. Burn it all. Misery for all—since that is what God wants from us. The endless ebb and flow of us in time searching for God’s will. His will for us has been shown in an accomplished liar and con man who scratches backs in exchange for unwavering support. The man, who could shoot someone in cold blood in the middle of 5th avenue and not lose his faithful, has given the Right what they wanted. These are the times for ever increasing fascism. Roe has fallen. Massive suffering will follow as the righteous will not stop until all people are under the boot.

Akin to those living under Warren Jeffs, the evangelicals now in power put forward an image of smiles and clean living. It’s just a matter of extremes, lighting up the immediate hostility and revenge of those who want freedom for all is not a concern. In biblical context, the men of Issachar were recruited to support regime change. Were these men charged to bring about a change of heart in the people? Or were they charged to employ subterfuge to smash the opposition? The biblical account is not clear hence we get to write our story to meet our own purposes.

In the end, force and deception will lose. The indomitable spark of humanism has taken hold of the collective human mind. The prophets will continue to enslave individuals to do their bidding, to submit to rape and oppression, but freedom people will continue to resist the will of these men of God. The fear of these men will continue to diminish, and finally someday, will we be rid of these men of understanding.

Amen.

“Outrage is not a Fruit of the Spirit”

But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, self-control; against such things there is no law. Galatians 5:22-23.

I went to church yesterday with my wife on one of those rare Sundays when not working. We had a guest speaker, the very few people present (largely due to widespread consternation about the mask mandate) were ‘socially distanced’ about the sanctuary, everyone was wearing a mask. I thought it was responsible behavior. (If everyone did this to protect each other—the mandates that so many people complain about would not be necessary; but I digress.) Not getting into the meat of the sermon, I’ll instead focus on one small, almost inconsequential, part of it in which the point was made that “Outrage is not a fruit of the Spirit.”

The statement was well-intentioned. As I understood and interpreted the context in which the statement was made, it implied to me personally that a good and proper Christian response to the raging clown show of dangerous divisions in our country, largely fomented and enabled by the dominant Christian Right, is to be meek and mild. A mousy, kind Christian is a good Christian. I’ve been told this by many people, in various ways throughout my life but somehow, I haven’t been convinced of it yet. Yes sir, I know ‘outrage’ did not make Paul’s list. And yes sir, I realize ‘outrage’ is what is compelling the lies which empower the Trumpites to rip this country apart with all this Q-anon and election fraud nonsense. (And if this is what you meant to address then kudos; however, you did not elaborate and clarify as perhaps you should have.) You, as I interpreted, appeared to be talking mainly about an emotional response (to any stimuli,) which, in and of itself, mildness is not necessarily a bad thing—if it is discerned to be the right response within the given conditions. I don’t believe the emotional component alone determines the ‘rightness’ of any response. The head should govern primarily. As Solomon taught, everything has its season. I believe clearly that this season demands outrage. The debate is not about outrage itself, but concerns the question of whether or not the outrage is justified.

Considering Jesus’ example, I ask myself the question of how ‘mild’ Jesus was in confronting the (most likely very worked up) crowd about to stone a woman for adultery? Can we imagine the tone of the statement, “Who here is without sin?” How gentle was Jesus when delivering the ‘seven woes’ speech to the Pharisees? Were those words peaceful, patient, and kind? Can we say that Jesus was not outraged when overturning the money-changing tables at the Temple? Was He less-than gentle? Did He lose his sense of self-control? Ezekiel (as I brought up in a previous post) recorded the Lord’s words of indignation towards Israel for its lying princes and prophets who oppressed the poor widows, orphans, and aliens. Outrage is listed as a synonym of indignation in my thesaurus. The Spirit is God. These words were spoken according to the Spirit, are they not His fruit since they come from Him?

Context is especially important in interpretation. This is Paul’s list of the ‘works of the flesh.’

“Now the works of the flesh are evident: sexual immorality, impurity, sensuality, idolatry, sorcery, enmity, strife, jealousy, fits of anger, rivalries, dissensions, divisions, envy, drunkenness, orgies, and things like these.” Galatians 5:20-21

The contrast between fleshly and spiritual desires which motivate us to action provides a context for what Paul was driving at. As I interpret the Christian Right’s entanglement with political power to right society’s wrongs, they’ve stirred up (at least) enmity, strife, fits of anger, rivalries, dissensions, and divisions. As evidenced by the number of enemies I’ve accumulated by being vocal about my opposition to Trumpian-religious syncretism, it seems I could well be accused of many of these crimes on the fleshly list as well; and here is where we are. The difference lies not necessarily in the feeling experienced in the middle of a conflict but in the intention towards a desired outcome–whether it be for selfish reasons or not. The common denominator behind the motivation for causing strife and dissention determining the rightness or wrongness of it lies in the motive of the doer to either gain power for himself or to sacrifice himself for the freedom of others. I do not see any evidence at all that either Trump or his enablers in the Republican party and in the Christian Right are willing to sacrifice themselves for anyone. It is a vicious world these people are creating; the master(s) will turn on even the most loyal supporters if the most absurd demands of the ‘leaders’ are not met. They openly seek to be our lords, and millions of us believe they are only hope for our freedom. This is so sad for all of us.

A majority of Christians recognize the ‘prophets’ (whether or not you even understand this) which inspire the faithful to (as I see the devotion in those who hate me for my view of the man) worship Trump. As I see it, you have sold yourselves to, and effectively worship, a devil. That means I am accusing many in the church of the crime of idolatry for this devotion and adulation. I also am accusing many in the church of following false prophets who make all sorts of claims concerning conversations with God in which they’re given privileged information to then pass on to those who are hungry for this sort of thing, and who also describe trips to heaven to help enforce their ‘favored’ status among the faithful. They make up stuff about future events to satisfy our desire for control over the future (and supernatural things.) This, as I see it, is a form of sorcery which leads to serious dissentions and divisions within the body. This body of lies provides cover for the princes to then lie as well. Peer pressure is applied to silence opposition to the prevailing winds in Christian culture. (Understanding this helps me deal emotionally with how people tend to react to what I have to say.)

Becoming ‘outraged’ about this mass apostacy is largely unacceptable; this majority acceptance of what is ‘love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, self-control’ has taken decades as the charismatics have done their work to remove reason and the really hard scholarly work out of the biblical interpretation equation. Feelings now rule. (Surveys showing the very significant decline in biblical literacy among churchgoers objectively demonstrate this.) People like me are shamed as troublemakers who, in ‘fits of anger,’ create strife and dissention where there should be none. The peacemakers amongst us do the gentle thing to remind the fierier souls to take it easy. What is seen by the passionate as being left out are the commitments (faithfulness) to the fruit of goodness which is being trampled by all the liars feeding on the gullible. Saying that ‘goodness’ is only distantly related to ‘truth’ uncouples what could anchor the more emotionally fragile among us from confidence in believing any promise. This is the theology which is strongly implied by today’s feelings (as guided by our leadership which appeals to our authoritarian proclivities as a species) which are understood to have an almost direct correlation to the ‘truth’ of whatever proclamation is being made or other stimuli being experienced. It’s in the music, atmosphere (lights and special effects,) liturgy, and physical structure of how we do church. The ‘feelings’ approach to ministry among the faithful, and evangelism to the young, both does not work (as the young are leaving the church in droves—they want moral substance, which they largely not getting) and alienate the broken (as they are taught they must feel and express ‘joy’ to be a true part of the club.) This, quite frankly, is cruel and alienating to those who have not submitted and acclimated to that culture. The dispelling of reason and diversity which leads to the formation of a cultural exclusivity (in the process ‘Americanizing’ our Christianity) should be (seen as) outrageous; but it isn’t.

This is why I had such a visceral reaction to the well-meaning statement that “Outrage is not a fruit of the Spirit;” I am outraged by the feelings dominant theology which alienates and separates, as it (among other things) leaves the faithful unable to morally reason well enough to understand that worshipping, as the hope for a future Christian America, a man like Trump, is morally bankrupt and a terrible witness to the love of God. We’ve been blinded by a large group of evil ‘teachers,’ ‘prophets,’ and ‘apostles’ who are well-connected politically. The faithful, understandably, do no wish to hear that they’ve been duped. How easy it is to preach a sermon urging us to be gentle, ‘not judge lest ye be judged,’ to be ‘meek’ and mild, to exhibit patience, and self-control which does not seek to inform the listener of what the grammatical-historical, in-context, approach (and, getting really deep into hermeneutics, the ‘relevance theory’ approach, which I’m familiar with this methodology having taken an intro to linguistics class in college; here is a very brief introduction) to interpreting what the biblical meaning of those qualities is (or should be) to then act accordingly as situations and conditions dictate. Taking a host of biblical virtues and qualities as an absolute can lead to conflicts between seemingly conflicting virtues; considering this reality, there has to be a season for everything.

Throwing out a term like ‘outrage’ without a whole lot of discussion about its possible justification, leaves the listener to fill in his or her own meaning (as defined by the dominant culture in which the word is heard) to reaffirm what they already believe. One can simply fill in the blank of ‘outrage’ with ‘lefty’s’ burning, looting, and breaking windows—‘nough said. There is little to challenge the listener with the idea that there may be issues worth being outraged about. This can close avenues to conversation, to people being heard, which leads to alienation, resentment, hatred, and ultimately, violence. As Dr. King wisely pointed out, “Riot is the language of the unheard.”

In my mind, if you really want to be a peacemaker, you should work to hear everyone and provide a forum in which they may be heard by opposing those who build systems which keep people out. We honestly believe we can keep the peace by building walls—either literally or figuratively. We divide others to protect ourselves; we segregate and isolate one group from other in some self-protective scheme using echo-chambers, special interest economic protections, churches, and prisons to do it. This is easy road we’ve been on. Peacemaking, as I understand it, is the hard road of getting rid of presuppositions, lies, and the automatic labels; ‘god-haters,’ ‘socialists,’ ’communists,’ ‘criminals,’ and the like. This may mean getting uncomfortable with and then outraged about our extensive efforts to reassert a ‘white, Christian values America’ which actively persecutes the most vulnerable amongst us to live lives of shame and separation. Instead of taking the harder road by looking for the elusive ‘mean’ in understanding, for the compromise, or the extended offer of peace, and a ‘place at the table,’ we do the ‘easy’ thing by going scorched earth to demand that those who have been mistreated by us should ‘none-the-less’ bend the knee so they may gain our favor. This is a recipe for war, and it is what the Christian Right has brought us (now having its nadir in its champion and representative Donald Trump.) I’m afraid this atmosphere has led me to believe those who shush me to be gentle (and that good fellow yesterday was not personally calling me out as he likely doesn’t know me from Adam,) are likely either totally blind to what is happening or are actively working (conscious of it or not) to keep the status quo because it ‘feels’ safer. It isn’t.

These days are outrageous and as such ‘these days’ are screaming for moral discernment and courage. As I understand it, in a biblical sense, ‘outrage’ can be righteous since, as pointed out previously, God Himself has been ‘outraged.’ I’m called to be an imitator, am I not?

Difficult times are ahead, which will be largely governed by fear. The church is governed by fear as evidenced by the kind of man they chose to be their representative. Unthoughtful, arrogant (which pairs well with ignorance,) fearful (unable to tolerate dissent or question,) authoritarian (demanding total loyalty to him, all others be damned,) uneducated and uninterested, pragmatic, and dishonest (weaving tales which have no bearing in reality,) compiles a pretty good representation of our neo-apostolic, politically connected, mega-church networks of today. The voice projected by these networks is extremely loud, as the world sees ‘Jesus-people,’ the image they see is largely of them. It is about time to get educated, which will provide a proper base for the outrage; then grow a backbone and speak out against this evil—no matter what it costs. Our country must have its reckoning.  

We must demand that the dirt be exposed despite the pain and embarrassment. It did not work out well for the former Soviet Union to forego its reckoning with the evils of communism and corruption; it fell right back into nostalgia longing for the good ol’ days. Likewise, if we do not expose all the crime, corruption, incompetence, and evil in the Trump administration, and all of the complaisance to all these evils by his Christian enablers, then the nation will not, and cannot heal. The echo chambers will be filled with smug, confident, self-righteous, and woefully ignorant crusaders who will perpetuate the culture of lies by just making stuff up without evidence which a more capable authoritarian will advantage himself to bring us even greater evil in the future; and the (Q-anon infested) church will cheer this.

Truth will be merely limited by the number of possibilities which is (and will continue to be) a total disaster. If this claim is confusing to you, think of it this way: [Q1] Is it possible there are little green men zipping about in outer space in flying saucers? [Q2] Is it likely? [Q3] Is there reason to believe this is happening? Yes is the obvious answer to the first question [Q1] and no is the reasonable answer to the following questions [Q1 & Q2] due to the complete lack of evidence [for Q1] which determines that it would be unjustified to believe there are little green men flying around in alien spacecraft. Trump’s claims of election fraud are functionally equivalent as there has been a complete lack any evidence to support the many accusations. Yet people believe flying saucers without evidence just like they believe in Trump by the millions—and in the genuine and truly funny co-believer Melissa Carone! (Thank you, God, very much for humor to get us through! Getting back into seriousness…)  

Barring any hunger (or at least curiosity) for actual evidence to back the many claims from our authorities, the ‘apostles’ and ‘prophets’ will ‘whitewash’ for their princes, and the vulnerable (and the skeptics) will continue to be outcast. But man, will we feel righteous and confident…

It is time for outrage. It is time for division. It is time to argue. It is time to expose. As it is also time to laugh, and teach others to laugh, at just how stupid this ‘movement’ is (here is an old example of how this could be done,) so we can all lower our guard enough to repent, forgive ourselves and each other, and then laugh at our own stupidity to hope that we don’t get fooled again.

Corona: Judgment from God?

These also are sayings of the wise. Partiality in judging is not good. Whoever says to the wicked, “You are in the right,” will be cursed by peoples, abhorred by nations, but those who rebuke the wicked will have delight, and a good blessing will come upon them.  Proverbs 24: 23-25

It is no secret that in the past, viruses, and other natural disasters have been blamed upon God’s wrath upon certain sinful behaviors. It does not need to be cited that, for example, many Christian leaders have claimed the HIV virus was God’s specific judgement upon homosexual behavior. Now we have a virus which seems to be infecting people at an alarming rate (some estimates claim could kill some 40 million people if left unchecked,) and has killed over 32,000 people worldwide (as of March 29) without signs that we’ve reached the peak. I know the Trumpers have said this thing is no worse than the flu. It is foolish and destructive for our beloved to so blatantly undermine our ability to sort facts by constantly speaking and tweeting out contradictions, misinformation, and outright lies to serve his own interests; it’s all ‘fake news’ right? Here are some facts about the differences.

The facts are that this virus is on track to kill a lot more people than the flu, from all walks of life (though it is hitting older folk much harder) and differing faiths and lifestyles, worldwide, simply because of its ability to spread and its much higher lethality. Now for the religious questions: is this virus a specific curse from God? And if it is, what is the specific sin? The purpose of this essay is to evaluate some very common ‘Christian’ sayings and beliefs which uphold the notion that God specifically curses some while blessing others leading to the conclusion that God favors those who appear to be doing well according to our standards of what ‘doing well’ means (e.g. you are healthy, in control of yourself, your surroundings, your position in life, and have wealth.) Though we may mean well, these beliefs lead to some serious contradictions, say terrible things about God’s intentions, and hurt lots of people. Hopefully, I will shed some light on some harmful stuff and at least plant a seed so we may abandon the ‘health and wealth’ (and their progeny, the ‘New Apostolic Reformation’) teachers who are poisoning the church with things which sound good (2 Timothy 4: 3-4) when times are good but crumble when trouble comes. I’m going to point out some ways in which these teachers try to protect themselves from the implications of their own teachings now that we have a ‘curse’ which is reaching out to the whole world, point out a few contradictions along the way concerning dispensationalism and evangelistic intent, and point out the glaring overreach and pharisaical hypocrisy of ‘two-kingdom theology’ heavily promoted by leaders in the Christian Right.

(In doing this I’m going against the majority of the ‘Christian’ teaching out there; the ‘hateful divider’ (a given label I willingly accept—though the ‘hateful’ part describes what I feel towards demonstrably false (if one accepts biblical authority,) and self-serving teaching; not towards people) speaks again…)

Our common language which includes ‘God won’t give you anything you can’t handle’ (here is a link to some solid teaching on the saying) and ‘God helps those who help themselves,’ coupled with a cacophony of contradictory ‘Christian’ theologies and eschatologies, lead us to believe we must understand (and, by intention or not, manage) the ‘Will of God’ experientially by our relative perceptions and definitions of ‘blessings’ and ‘curses.’ The attachment (made by our celebrity teachers) of our perception of ‘blessing’ to God’s personal favor (i.e. ‘health and wealth’ theology) leads us to suppose those who cannot manage the pressure upon their lives or happen to be suffering from some sort of attack, like a virus for instance, must be either inadequate in their faith, or must be doing something terribly, and specifically, wrong to warrant God’s specific curse. The claim has been made in past about natural disasters being judgments for specific sins; now that we have a ‘curse’ which is affecting us all, how are the leaders of the Christian Right handling the implications of past proclamations to today’s reality?   

Fox News regularly has Pastor Robert Jeffress, friend and steadfast cheerleader for Trump, on for commentary. In the past, Jeffress stated specifically that 911 was a judgment from God for the sin of abortion. Yet now he claims the Coronavirus is not a specific judgment because, in his eschatological framework, the antichrist is not on the scene yet. Considering past statements Jeffress has made on the antichrist, this current claim has me scratching my head for a few different reasons. As a Preterist, I want to make clear that Dispensationalism is a ridiculous theology (I know ‘everyone’ believes it) which leads to the self-contradictory reasoning Jeffress employed in his sermon entitled “Is Coronavirus a Judgement from God?” in an effort to protect his defense of Trump and ‘Two-Kingdom Theology.’ I’ll explain. Referring to RightWingWatch link above, Jeffress stated that our ‘collapse was inevitable’ because our spiritual and moral decline and that Obama was ‘paving the way for the Antichrist.’

In the Texas Monthly article above, Jeffress claims that it is desirable to act in ways which would delay the coming of Christ to ‘give us more time to save people.’ It seems his support for Trump comes from a desire to buy us more time through Trump’s actions to stave off our moral decline and the arrival of the antichrist. Although Christians United for Israel, for example, denies that we have the power to hasten or delay the return of Christ, Christian Zionists (who are typically dispensationalists) act politically in ways to foster conditions to hasten the return of Christ according to various dispensational speculations. Two obvious examples are the Balfour Declaration and the current strong support for Trump’s policy concerning Israel which, if this really is what God wants us to do, helps create the conditions required in the various dispensational frameworks to hasten Christ’s return to earth.

The simple fact is most Christians believe Jerusalem being is Jewish hands is critical to the fulfilment of end-times prophecy since they believe in the dispensationalist ‘Third Temple’ prophecy. (One of these years, I’ll post my essay on this ‘prophecy.’) This goes well beyond these Zionist groups claims to be merely trying to benefit from God’s promise of blessing to Abraham in Genesis 12.

Here we have a glaring contradiction between various teachers in the dispensational camp: What should we do Pastor Jeffress? Work to hasten (2 Peter 3:12? Σπεδω can also mean ‘to desire earnestly’) or slow it down (as if God isn’t interested in saving everyone possible 2 Peter 3: 9)? Trump’s actions to stave off our moral decline (which, apparently, will delay Christ’s return) by appointing Judges who are loyal to him, err, oops, will reverse Roe v. Wade, are in tension with his Israel policies which many Christians believe will hasten Christ’s return. Who to believe?

Setting aside this contradiction of evangelistic intent (by using government power to make us all behave better to delay the arrival of the antichrist—so we may save more people) as opposed to desiring the return of Christ soon (which dispensationalists again believe in using government power to meet this desire,) Jeffress seems to be forced to conclude Corona is not a specific judgment from God but rather a general consequence of sin. I would agree with that statement; disaster in general is a consequence of our sin, our bad decisions, our misguided desires, our stupidity, our arrogance… Therefore, to be consistent Jeffress, you should recant your statement concerning 911 and its cause. The notion that God sent those men to hijack those planes and drive them into those towers is akin to the saying that ‘God won’t give you more than you can handle.’ Both assertions support the notion that God is the cause of evil. What happened on 911 was evil. The wars which came as a result cost trillions of dollars (which could have been used to alleviate human suffering) and hundreds of thousands of lives were evil. What is the purpose of God’s judgments anyway? Did 911 result in the revocation of Roe v. Wade? Did it drive us to repentance and revival? No, it didn’t. Can we then say God’s judgment for the sin of abortion was less than efficacious to drive us all back before His throne? Good for you to get it right this time about Corona, but I am afraid your correct deduction may well be motivated by a desire to protect yourself and your defense of a narcissistic, incompetent, utterly self-centered sociopath as our path to staving off the antichrist; this virus threatens older folk (Trump’s base) the most hence we ought be careful about suggesting they may have grievously sinned shouldn’t we? Jeffress, I think you should reconsider your whole theology (and eschatology) and ask yourself a few very painful questions: “Have we sinned by embracing some false teachings which led us to place our faith in government power to fulfill our desires (however varied they may be) so that we would accept and support the notion that government is not accountable to the same moral rules to which individuals are accountable?” “Is it really justified to support an immoral man who is a liar of epic proportions, who has worked fervently to undermine our trust in anyone but him because we believe he is the key to our restoration as blessed people?” And, “Does the Bible teach us that the ‘ends justify the means’?” You’ve made some very bold claims in the defense of the use of government power resting in the hands of an immoral man even claiming those who do not support Trump are ‘morons.’

Do these recent events lead you to question anything? Or do we all double down to support our prior claims no matter what God may be asking us to look at? Could this very real and costly problem be God’s means to call us to question, evaluation, and discipline? It is seems you have backed yourself into a corner to which you cannot, to save face, admit you’re in—you must ‘double down’ and say the virus is not a specific judgment because, according to your claim, that God’s discipline only comes to those who are not living rightly.

This ‘moron,’ who evidently is, according to your claim, morally and spiritually deficient, stands on a different base pastor. I do not rely upon the modern-day equivalent of ‘chariots and horses’ (i.e. government power—see Psalms 20: 7; Isaiah 31:1; Hosea 10:13) but rather stand in faith that is ‘Not by might, nor by power, but by my Spirit, says the LORD of hosts’ Zechariah 4: 6. This frees me from having to hitch my wagon to the fortunes of some earthly leader who is going to allegedly restore us. This is but one of the Achille’s heels of ‘Two-Kingdom theology’ which forces the adherent to ‘double down’ and make up new stories and excuses when things go south. There are always and will always be (should the Lord tarry,) groups of people who will not be ‘living rightly’ hence there will always be something or someone to blame for our troubles. But what happens if the appearances and consequences of those troubles fall upon the faithful? Should we doubt and question that (largely unaccountable government power) upon which we’ve based our faith? Do we not think that hitching our witness, our commission, to the efficacy of the use of worldly power to make our country a more ‘Godly’ one, makes that witness dependent upon our own abilities to manage people (to be more Godly) by either shame or force? If that isn’t pharisaical, what is?

Pastor Jeffress, is but a mere man. Hence, he has neither the right nor the ability to pick and choose what is a specific judgment from God and what is a consequence of the Fall (Genesis 3.) To claim the powers of a prophet to make such determinations paints him into a corner when we have a generalized disaster such as that which is unfolding right now. His determination to uphold prior claims requires the man to say Corona is not a judgment from God because to say otherwise would strongly imply that our collective Christian reliance (and faith) upon (and in) government power (and in Trump) has failed miserably to bring the blessing which comes from ‘living rightly.’ The fact is that our faith in known narcissistic liar, whom we’ve accepted is unaccountable to the moral values the rest of us are, has failed since our government’s response to the outbreak has been bungled from the start  (in good part due to the obstruction and constant stream of misinformation, contradictions, and outright lies from the leader of our government.)

Perhaps this disaster is God’s call to evaluation (Psalm 26:2) and self-reflection (Lamentations 3:40; 1 Corinthians 11:28-31; 2 Corinthians 13:5; 1 Thessalonians 5:21.) Perhaps we should reconsider our commitment to the belief that government, which claims to be 90% Christian, is not accountable to the same moral rules which apply to the rest of us? Isn’t it at least possible that this pandemic could have been contained if our government, under Trump, had been truthful about the threat to then move decisively to protect the public despite appearances and the possible threat to our leader’s re-election hopes?

Jeffress does not know the Bible as well as he claims; the truth is, God disciplines those he loves (Deuteronomy 8: 5; Psalm 119:75; Proverbs 3:11-12; Revelation 3:19.) We may believe our hearts rest in the right place but if we are wrong-headed and unwise is it not merciful and just for God correct us through some wake-up call? (Proverbs 10: 13) There is great hope in receiving this discipline since scripture says this proves we are not illegitimate (Hebrews 12: 5-11.)

It is by hardness of heart that one refuses to accept discipline (Leviticus 26:23; Proverbs 3:11) by we could grow wise (Proverbs 19:20.) Our Christian Right leaders, like Jeffress, are not entertaining the notion that the seriousness of this outbreak could be a consequence of our misguided faith in a man completely unfit for office because our Christian leadership tells us our support of this man is God’s Will to bring us back to greatness. Perhaps this is a wake-up call to the hypocrisy of having a government which claims to be 90% Christian by self-identification yet at the same time is not accountable to Christian moral values?

Jeffress claims, ‘there is no such thing as the separation of church and state.’ If this is true, our witness is damaged by our acceptance of blatant dishonesty and immorality to meet some ‘higher’ goals. We’ve hung our hopes on the power of government to meet our commission and fulfill our responsibility to live as examples. Our leaders, political and religious, like it or not, are teachers who teach by example. If it is true that there is no separation of church and state, then our majority Christian leadership is not following the Bible instruction concerning the responsibilities incumbent upon teachers.  Scripture says,

 ‘Show yourself in all respects to be a model of good works, and in your teaching show integrity, dignity, and sound speech that cannot be condemned, so that an opponent may be put to shame, having nothing evil to say about us.’ Titus 2: 7-8

Therefore ‘morons’ like me are hostile to the false teaching from those in the Christian Right who suppose a lack of separation between church and state; the obvious bad behavior of the state has many people saying bad things about us—and rightfully so. It would be far better, I believe, if Christians in government would keep their mouths shut about prophecies and the will of God (as spoken by some yahoo who claims to be a modern-day prophet,) manipulating history to meet some dispensational (or dominionistic) fantasy, to rather work diligently to seek the truth, uphold justice, protect the weak, and hold wrong doers accountable (Romans 13: 4) without going around kissing Trump’s rear-end because that is what you are told to do to save your position. This is sick; and we now call it ‘Christian.’ Christian in government, simply be a servant of the people—nothing more—that would be an excellent witness. Thank you.

Perhaps we are being judged for our ‘pragmatism’ trusting in ‘horses and chariots’ rather than in the power of God. Maybe we are suffering the consequences of our toleration of a liar as our chosen one to restore our nation to greatness, our duplicity towards truth (Ephesians 4:15; 1 Peter 1:22,) and our syncretic merger of church and state to suppose we can impose ‘righteous’ rule by dishonest means. We have been corrupted by the mechanisms of the dishonest state (1 Corinthians 15:33.)

Scripture does not speak well of the merging of conflicting principles which can only lead to corruption and injustice (2 Kings 17: 33-41; Deuteronomy 4:2; 12: 31.) Without self-regulation, the power of the state becomes necessary to impose order. It becomes a disaster in itself when the church, which should serve as a moral beacon to uphold the truth and serve as examples to a world which relies upon the power of the state to maintain order, sees itself as essentially the same as the state in how it should maintain that order. The power of internal reformation (Romans 12:2) a central teaching of Christ and His apostles is thus denied. Jesus was greatly concerned about what is inside rather than external appearances (Matthew 23: 25-28) because “(T)here is nothing outside of a person that can defile him by going into him. Rather, it is what comes out of a person that defiles him” (Mark 7:15.) Ironically, even though the Christian Right may claim to mean well in guiding the nation back to God, acting rightly by serving as examples to truth, justice, and mercy rather than compromising with dishonest uses of power, would, I believe, bring about the reformations they claim to seek. We are plainly commanded to not compromise or associate with dishonesty (Deuteronomy 25:16; Psalms 26: 4; 101: 3; Proverbs 11: 1; 20: 23.) God seeks the heart and it is the very essence of biblical teaching that God desires our hearts. Type in a word search for ‘heart’ in your Bible app and you will find that this is what God desires—your heart. What do you receive in return for dishonesty? (Psalms 20: 17; Isaiah 28:15; 59: 8; Jeremiah 5: 27; 6: 13; 8: 10.)  Distrust, plain and simple.

There is an obvious common theme in my polemic—compromise with a deceitful person (or system) is anything but righteous. The Christian Right has sold its soul to power—earthly power. And as such is reaping, along with the rest of us along with those who have pledged fealty to such an arrangement, its benefits which come from allegiance to a dishonest, self-interested sociopath who is at its head. May God have mercy on our arrogance (and in our leader’s pathological, raging incompetence.)

We should not think of ourselves so highly to think we are above being disciplined. Scripture says, ‘…when we are judged by the Lord, we are disciplined so that we may not be condemned with the world’ (1 Corinthians 11: 27-32.) In receiving the elements, we not only remember the sacrifice of our Lord, but we pledge fealty to the principles our faith calls us to (John 6: 55- 59; 1 Corinthians 11: 17-34.) We cannot be syncretic in this agreement (1 Corinthians 10: 21.) The statement of judgment so that ‘we not be condemned with the world’ is very important to accept so that we will not corrupt ourselves by doing things according to the way the world conducts business. We are supposed to be the beacon to truth (Proverbs 16:6; Zechariah 8: 19; 1 John 3: 18; 1 Timothy 3: 15) and justice (Psalms 45: 7; 99: 4; Isaiah 61: 8; Hosea 12: 8; Amos 5: 15.) Please do a word search on ‘truth’ in your Bible app to understand the importance God place upon that principle and the commitment to it. I really do not understand how one can pledge allegiance to a liar such as Trump (and the bunch of self-interested, shifty, feigned sycophants in the Republican Party, and the Democrats who are every bit as calculating and crafty) and still believe one is following the will of God according to scripture. Reliance on any power but God’s makes you a slave! God wants you free…

Judgment is real thing and is warranted because we are guilty. There is nothing arbitrary about judgments—they are given as consequence to what we do. We live under a New Covenant—the sin of the world has been judged at the cross. The Jewish Temple system was judged according Jesus’ prediction (as recorded in Matthew 24 and Luke 21) by the Romans. All Christian vestigial reliance upon the Temple system was obliterated; this was recorded by Josephus in his account of the First Jewish War. Now we still live with the consequences for our beliefs and actions—there is no immunity or excuse. I claim no status as prophet but stand rather on the authority of God’s Word as upheld by numerous councils and scholars throughout the ages who have struggled and suffered to maintain integrity through time. I believe and stake my faith upon the testimony of suffering—not upon the so-called ‘miraculous’ testimony and parlor tricks from charlatans and frauds. There is no need for superstition or hocus-pocus. But we are nostalgic, aren’t we? The old notion of the ‘divine right of kings’ has been resurrected by the Christian Right and ‘kings’ do take notice of this belief in their subjects; and these ‘kings’ act accordingly. Our ‘king’ demonstrably acts as if he is the only one who matters; his interests are supreme (even though he said he was being sarcastic when he referred to himself as the ‘chosen one.’) We have placed our faith in such a man who would play with matters so serious and grave. It is a shame that our ‘greatness’ is wrapped up into and attached to a boastful liar (and irresponsible child.) I pray that we hear this call to repentance for believing in our own power and in those who testify falsely as to the will of God. We are experiencing the consequences of our misplaced faith in a very bad man. There is nothing spooky or arbitrary about it…

P.S. If you do not buy my argument that we are ‘experiencing the consequences’ of supporting Trump, here is another argument